Messages

1

General Discussion / Re: What is the consensus on the accuracy of Trim Tags in '67

« on: April 07, 2010, 01:11:33 PM »

Any dealer options would not be on the trim tag as well.

Buddy

2

General Discussion / Re: Opinions requested

« on: March 28, 2010, 03:26:13 PM »

I too have a 67 RS/SS with headrests. Mine is an L35 w/TH400. They are not very common.

3

Restoration / Re: Chemical Dipping

« on: February 15, 2010, 04:01:53 PM »

Here is Eco-Clean in Atlanta

http://www.eco-clean.com/auto.htm

4

Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1967 Camaro radius rod research

« on: January 31, 2010, 04:27:46 PM »

Yes, I still have the Maroon Big Block, Do you already have my info??

Thx

5

Restoration / Re: what color combo to use with turquoise interior

« on: January 24, 2010, 05:15:41 PM »

I agree with Kurt. I had a 68 RS/SS with this combo and it stood out everywhere...Beautiful

Buddy

6

Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1967 Camaro radius rod research

« on: January 24, 2010, 05:14:04 PM »

My car is in pieces so I will get all I can for you.

Buddy

7

Restoration / Re: what color combo to use with turquoise interior

« on: January 21, 2010, 02:44:32 PM »

I prefer the turq ext paint w/blk stripe

Buddy

8

Restoration / Re: Remove rust or sheet metal?

« on: January 06, 2010, 08:11:22 PM »

If at all possible save the original panels. They are heavier than the replacements so even with a little thinning they might still be thicker than replacements. Replacements can be identified a mile away.

Buddy

9

General Discussion / Re: Unrestored 1967 RS

« on: January 02, 2010, 03:18:00 PM »

Any Pics you can post??

Thx
buddy

10

Restoration / Re: black on tailpan on ss cars

« on: December 28, 2009, 12:14:21 AM »

I think that is a good idea for people with no paint experience. I myself have been painting for 25 years and used lacquer exclusively in the early 80's. I hope people will follow your advice and see for themselves that lacquer is not glossy. (Shiny is not Glossy).

Buddy

11

Restoration / Re: black on tailpan on ss cars

« on: December 26, 2009, 10:05:05 PM »

Back to the point that no lacquer is gloss when applied. Even if it is called gloss lacquer. You have to finish it to get the glossy look. Believe me, GM did not do this.

Post some pics of these cars you inspected. THX

 

12

General Discussion / Re: Merry Christmas

« on: December 25, 2009, 03:40:15 PM »

MERRY CHRISTMAS !!!!  HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

Hope you get those parts in your stocking.

Buddy

 

13

Restoration / Re: black on tailpan on ss cars

« on: December 25, 2009, 03:37:37 PM »

As Bill Clinton would say, It depends on what your definition of Glossy is....hehe

My definition is it is either Glossy or it is not. Lacquer is SEMI (to some degree) until worked out or reflowed.

Why is there no poll on this thread?? Are polls allowed on this Forum??

 

By the way...Merry Christmas everybody......

14

Restoration / Re: black on tailpan on ss cars

« on: December 24, 2009, 08:08:56 PM »

Thankyou...That description fits with what I am seeing on the green survivor I posted pics of. You can see that it is not blocked smooth, but it is glossy.

He just said' NOT GLOSS'.....  Egg Shell is a Semi.
I am confused with this statement....... it is not blocked smooth, but it is glossy.?



Just keeping going for the fun of it.

15

Restoration / Re: black on tailpan on ss cars

« on: December 21, 2009, 09:27:04 PM »

Pex68...Give it up...Charlie believes what he believes and even though 90% of the experts and others believe otherwise you will NOT change his mind. It's like convincing the far left that Obama is destroying our country. Ain't gonna happen 

Sorry Charlie..no disrespect here.

Move on...there's nothing to see here......