CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 09:52:19 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103827 Posts in 12193 Topics by 4703 Members
Latest Member: wishbone
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: So you think you have a Dana, Nickey,Berger Baldwin, etc...? on: May 02, 2014, 03:37:14 AM
Hello everyone, is this the same database as NICB?
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Tyler's Car on: February 28, 2010, 05:13:27 PM
Its First.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 vin date stamp on: January 06, 2010, 07:00:30 PM
Here's something like what Warren is talking about. This is on a 1966 Suburban.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Dealer optioned 67 Camaro on: January 02, 2010, 12:22:45 PM
No designation was used for the TH400 auto transmission at the time this car was built. At NOR they eventually started using a "Z" for TH400 and at LOS they eventually went with "M" for both powerglide and TH400. Correct me if I'm wrong here but this car was fitted with a TH400 automatic.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 vin date stamp on: December 28, 2009, 07:12:26 PM
How was the conclusion or theory drawn that the code stamped has something to do with the 5/50 warranty? It seems like a strange way to keep track of warranty service work. How would a dealership know to even check the VIN for such a stamp? I thought they relied on the POP and used it like a credit card machine for any vehicle warranty service needing documentation so they could be reinbursed? I would think it might be more likely it had something to do with how the factory handled the car and was more specific to matching it to some kind of paperwork they were working from. Like the cowl tag was to Fisher would not the VIN tag be to Chevrolet? 
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Period correct engine value? on: December 15, 2009, 01:57:47 PM
Having a CE warranty block in my 69 Z11, and Keeping it right where it is, I'd like to propose that a change be made from Chevrolets warranty designation CE "Chevrolet Engine" to CE "Cousin Eddie".

I also propose that during the month of December that all owners with Cousin Eddie's hidden under the hood raise a Billy Beer in acceptance of our black sheep status in the Chevrolet family. The other eleven months of the year we can all go back to ignoring they exist.

JohnZ, can I get a second on the motion   Grin
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Early '67 Sub-frame date code? on: November 20, 2009, 06:33:51 PM
Is it stamped into the steel or painted/stenciled on the steel?
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 Z fan clutch on: September 18, 2009, 11:01:36 PM
So is it now acceptable to use the Eaton coil style clutch as "correct". I know John Z said that both were used and I'v seen an original 67 L78 with the Eaton??? I have the Eaton on a 68 L78 with the correct 4 rivet fan.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 x33 console delete? on: September 04, 2009, 01:48:07 PM
I have an X77 05C (May 3rd week) with factory spoiler, no D80 on TT, without console/gauges or dash tachometer. Would this mean it was dealer ordered before April 69?
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 fender support shield? on: June 02, 2009, 10:47:51 PM
Thanks so much to all of you for the information. It's all about sharing and learning here and I learned something this week Smiley That makes for a good week in my book! Now to figure out how to reproduce the rubber flap and clip..... hmmm.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 68 fender support shield? on: June 02, 2009, 12:14:42 PM
I took this off a 68 when doing a restoration a few years back. It was attached to the driver side fender support brace at the lower mounting holes. It had the remains of a rubber skirt but now only has the staple. Does anyone know the application for this piece and if its even original to camaro? I can't find it in the AIM. I'd also be interested to know what the rubber skirt looked like?
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Paint colors on: April 28, 2009, 09:34:22 AM
I like the color combo. 
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: A.I.R on 4053 Holley on: April 23, 2009, 07:36:49 PM
I see what you've done and it makes sense. I've still not found a T fitting for the vacum at carb and it makes me a little nervous to split that port when its feeding the advance. I'd still like to see a photo of an original setup. Thanks for sharing  Smiley
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 SS 350 Exhaust Manifold Heat Sheild? on: March 02, 2009, 01:14:54 PM
Their is a shield set up on TeamCamaro classifieds. I also have one and a set of manifolds too.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: No radio.... need ground straps? on: February 24, 2009, 10:51:10 PM
While I'm on the topic of my car I was wondering if anyone would have a clue to what label/sticker might have been applied to the interior of the glove box door opposite the tire pressure label? I just noticed it the other day and was curious since the residue looks similar to that of the pressure label only this was rectangle. Maybe a Scooby Doo sticker?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.455 seconds with 18 queries.