CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 22, 2014, 08:39:23 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107663 Posts in 12514 Topics by 4815 Members
Latest Member: NAPA68
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Dipstick for 67 L35 on: April 10, 2009, 03:13:23 PM
Sorry to but in, when your talking about 68's but maybe someone here can clear up a 67 dip stick question for me. If i'm correct  a 67 L35 dip stick should have a salmon tip & be P/N 3902399 plus the tube should be P/N 3899640 or would it be P/N 3870324 ?

thanks
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / motor mount recall request on: December 11, 2007, 09:12:43 AM
If anybody has a good picture of a motor mount recall kit on a 396 please post it.

thanks
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 19, 2007, 03:40:46 PM
Kurt,  I was looking back and i must have joined around March or April of 2005. My mistake on the Oct. date. That must be when the new formatt started. Anyway i was Rod67 in the old & new forums.  Thanks for all your help.

tar6569,  here are your numbers on the impala 396.  Pad : T05I8IVR and they are I's not 1's.  Partial vin : 6S260489. Casting date on block : D 22 6. Heads : 3872702 with casting dates of E 12 6 both heads are the same. Number by the flange at the back of the block : 3855961. Hope this helps.

thanks
Rod

4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 19, 2007, 01:25:10 PM
Kurt, I have had the same ID, Rod67 since Oct. 2005 when i joined, its the only ID i have had. Rod 67ss is someone else.

tar6569, I will post those numbers for you as soon as i can. ( @ work right now )

thanks
Rod
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 18, 2007, 09:20:43 AM
Kurt, I'm not getting a new ID & wasn't aware of any problems with the ID i have. Plaese let me know if there are any problems.

thanks
Rod
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 17, 2007, 08:56:19 AM
Thats good news, thanks kurt. The reason i got this block off ebay was because of the assemly date. My original engine is long gone and the 396 that was in my car is from a 1966 impala. I do have the POP for my car and the assemly date for my original engine is T0617MW, 11 days after the assemly date on the block i got from ebay, probably as close as i will ever get to my original engine.

thanks
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 16, 2007, 12:11:16 PM
Sure i got this block off ebay, but is the stamp legit??
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 16, 2007, 11:34:09 AM
and again
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 16, 2007, 11:08:23 AM
Sorry the picture is so small, hope this size picture is easier to see.
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 16, 2007, 10:58:38 AM
Does this assemly date & partial vin look legit, and if it does, anybody ever hear of the last number of the vin missing the pad ???

thanks
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Blacked out tail pan on: May 11, 2007, 09:49:02 AM
Sorry for the dumb question, was just reading ( on this site ) that only the tail pans on black cars were not blacked out.

Rod
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Blacked out tail pan on: May 11, 2007, 08:36:52 AM
I've read that some big blocks in 67 didnt have the tail pan blacked out if the body color was dark. My L35 is going back to the original maroon ( N-N ), should the tail pan be blacked out or not?

Also should the bumble bee stripe be white or black and if this could go both ways, which was more popular at the time.

Thanks
Rod
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Members from old forum version please post here on: February 23, 2007, 02:35:29 PM
Rod67 in the old & the new forum.

thanks
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Horn Button on: August 10, 2006, 01:40:22 PM
I have a 67 rs/ss L35 car with standard interior witch horn button is correct?  rs, ss or basic button

Thanks for the help
Rod
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct shifter on: June 15, 2006, 12:36:08 PM
I remember someone saying that dealerships used Hurst shifters as replacements when Muncies flew apart. Don't know if there is any truth to that or not.

Rod
Pages: [1] 2
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.478 seconds with 18 queries.