CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2013, 06:06:34 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
82241 Posts in 10505 Topics by 4352 Members
Latest Member: NCCaprice
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 24
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Starter nose for Z28 starter on: May 07, 2013, 05:36:44 AM
Gary, if you are OK with that 1968122, then we can talk more.  The 1st pic shows the void (right by the flywheel hole) in the casting that mine has. I think that is a feature of the later starter noses.  Tim's pic was solid in that spot. 
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Side Exhaust on my 69 on: April 25, 2013, 06:23:52 AM
Yea, the Hooker sidemounts were very cool, I had a set on mine back in the day! I wish I had a Camaro to put them on again (current rides are numbers cars) and if I could find them (they are no longer available).
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Control Arm Alignment Shims on: April 06, 2013, 10:27:34 AM
lloyd, do you need pics?
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Need advice on new tires? on: April 06, 2013, 06:30:15 AM
I run 215/70R14 TAs on my 14x6 rally on my 69, nice tire, no issues and my car is low Smiley
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Control Arm Alignment Shims on: April 06, 2013, 06:20:31 AM
I just went and checked my stash of shims.  A repro shim set I got from Ricks many years ago was actually pretty accurate, same shape as originals, stamped x-116, same as originals (but zinc plated).  But they were only the thinner versions.  and that part number RC-416, shows lloyds picture (not the same as what I got originally) and said they are discontinued.  The thicker shims with the rocket ship on them have a slightly taller top than the x-116 shims.  I have to be on the look out for these at the next swap meet Smiley Kevin

Here is an ebay auction of the repro set that looks like what I have

http://www.ebay.com/itm/55-77-CHEVY-IMPALA-CHEVELLE-UPPER-CONTROL-ARM-SUSPENSION-ALIGNMENT-SHIM-KIT-/370644531922?pt=Vintage_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item564c22bad2&vxp=mtr#ht_800wt_932

6  Site Comments / Discussion / Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Wanted or looking for forum. on: March 19, 2013, 02:27:37 PM
http://www.camaros.net/forums/index.php has two sections for wanted and selling parts/cars Smiley
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 small block power steering pump on: March 17, 2013, 03:16:27 PM
Actually the 6cyl, SB and BB all had the return line bent a different way Smiley 
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Convertible quarter panel brace on: March 16, 2013, 06:47:15 AM
No, there is a whole different structure under the vert sheet metal to support the top's trim sticks. Way different than the coupes.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969, which pinion snubber on: March 10, 2013, 07:46:12 AM
Just the plate was left

bolt on type
VN 05A
L48 M20
12 bolt 3.31

Push in type
NOR 10B early
10 bolt
LF7 PG
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Zl-2 Cowl Hood Production on: February 01, 2013, 07:01:48 PM
Smiley  I missed that too.  Dang spread sheets, they are so picky! thanks Kurt!
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Zl-2 Cowl Hood Production on: February 01, 2013, 03:04:35 PM
Just for fun, I looked at all v8 engines for 69 (207,148) vs the number of V8 cars built (coupe + vert)=(206,837).  So there were 311 more v8 engines counted by RPO, then were built.  I did not count the COPOs. Smiley  I am so confused now.
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Zl-2 Cowl Hood Production on: February 01, 2013, 02:54:19 PM
Sorry to keep wasting your time Ed, I am still trying to figure this RPO sheet out.  I looked the SS option package (Z27) 34,932 cars built.  The notes say a bunch of things are included.  First being the "special" engine. I do not think the 350/300 engine is part of the "included" catagory like the C05 top, since the number of them (22,339) is less then the total SS's built.  So we have to assume all the SS available engines are listed seperatley on the RPO pdf.  But when I total up all the 350/300, 396/325,350,375 and the L89s, I get 36,309, which is 1,377 more "SS" engines then were built.  I am missing another key peice? Smiley  thanks   
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Zl-2 Cowl Hood Production on: February 01, 2013, 02:29:16 PM
OK, I gotcha, I am relieved, it is just my intrepretation and not the data.  Smiley  Now I will look more closely at the totals armed with this info.  Thanks!
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Zl-2 Cowl Hood Production on: February 01, 2013, 01:42:40 PM
I am sorry to say, I now have my doubts as th the accuracy of the RPO spreadsheet.  I relied on it as gospel Sad

example from RPO table: Total 69 convertible production = 17573.  I added the L6 (1707), V8(15866) and Canada (935) and came up with 18508 verts built.  OK, lets not count Canada, then the totals match.  Then we take the non power tops (17573 (same number as total vert production??)) and the power tops (9631) and together they are 27204 verts.  

OK some number is not correct here.  lets assume the Canada cars are not included in the production numbers, then can we assume that any Canadian export did not count towards the option count (ZL2 hood as an example)?  

I am hoping the power top and non-power top numbers just need some correction, but it makes me wonder if there are any more "corrections" that are needed in the table?  
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Zl-2 Cowl Hood Production on: February 01, 2013, 01:27:14 PM
Ok, doing a quick window sticker google search, the COPOs did not have the "special ducted hood" called out.  But a SS did. But I could not find a Z11 one in my search.  Hmm, It now has me thinking, what other mandatory option was required on Z11s that was called out on the window sticker and could we deduce if the RPO counts for that option include or not include the mandatory option catagory. 
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 24
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 18 queries.