CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2014, 03:23:09 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105859 Posts in 12353 Topics by 4762 Members
Latest Member: HarryQ
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13
166  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Partial Vin 7L106819 on: April 21, 2006, 07:18:09 AM
The build date is P7P21 and that matches the vin for a camaro as far as the date is concerned.
167  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Partial Vin 7L106819 on: April 20, 2006, 04:26:56 PM
Any records of this car?  I have found the muncie for the car and would like to reunite the two.

Russ
168  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: COWL TAG HAS ME PUZZLED.. Is it worth while? on: April 12, 2006, 08:25:28 AM
looks to be an early production (9D = 4th week Sept) and with the "1" preceeding the body number I believe it was made in 68.

It would have to be a late production car, The X codes weren't being used in September 1968.
169  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 vs 68 seats - is there a difference? on: April 05, 2006, 08:38:34 AM
Metal seatbacks would be correct for your car.
170  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: L30/M20, ...2nd chance, ...do you think it's worth $1500 on: April 02, 2006, 12:04:16 PM
Where is the car located?
171  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Early 67 Z/28s on: February 09, 2006, 09:39:33 AM
The 1967 Z/28 did not have any emblems.  The early 1968 Z/28's had the 302 emblem on the fender and changed from the 302 emblem on the fender to Z/28 on the fender mid year.  I don't remember the time frame for the change.
172  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 302 HEADS (2.02) on: February 08, 2006, 04:38:41 PM
Maybe not completely original.   They would have been changed to the 2.02 valves.  I am interested in buying.  Do you have digital photos available?
Thanks,
Bill

I'm not sure what you mean.  All Chevy 302's come with 2.02/1.60 valves.
173  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: NOS rs gas cap on: January 19, 2006, 10:17:32 AM
Thanks.  Looking at the one with screws, the crome and other appearances did not look reproduction to me but I wasn't sure.  Thanks for the reply.
174  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / NOS rs gas cap on: January 18, 2006, 05:16:19 PM
I recently noticed some differences in the rs gas cap for 1967-68.  I looked at 2 originals that was caste or riveted together, a reproduction that was made the same but  known to be a reproduction and one that I was told is an NOS cap that has screws holding the gas cap cover to the part that fastens to the fill neck.  Could this one with the screws actually be an NOS cap?
175  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 302 HEADS (2.02) on: December 17, 2005, 02:13:12 PM
I would think they are worth between $300 and $400 in used condition.  IMHO
176  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 302 HEADS (2.02) on: December 16, 2005, 02:30:15 PM
What kind of shape are they in.  Bare castings, used but complete or fresh ready to bolt on?  It all makes a difference.  By the way, the casting numbers for the '67 302 heads were also used on lower performance engines in the 1.94/1.50 valve configuration so without a visual inspection, you can't tell if they are 2.02/1.60 heads.

Russ
177  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Another 1968 Z28 question - Cowl Hoods? on: December 07, 2005, 03:59:32 PM
Wasn't the '68 vert Z green with white stripes?
178  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Why are 69s worth more than 67s on: December 05, 2005, 11:03:57 AM
It has a lot to do with personal preference but I believe due to the COPO cars as well as the cross ram cars available in 1969 and not in 1967, those are the cars brining the biggest money.  As for personal preference, give me my vent windows.

Russ
179  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Identifing on: November 18, 2005, 09:23:36 AM
If it is a complete engine, the flywheel flange on the back of the crank is different on each crank.  The stamp pad is the best indicator as to how the engine was originally built by Chevrolet. 
180  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Another 1968 Z28 question - Cowl Hoods? on: November 14, 2005, 08:29:38 AM
The cowl induction hood (RPO ZL2) was not an option for the 1968 model year.  It has been installed by a prior owner.  Cowl induction for 1967 and 1968 was available as an option for the Z/28 and was an air cleaner assemble that had an air duct bolted up to the fire wall.

Russ
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 18 queries.