CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2015, 02:32:09 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112302 Posts in 12901 Topics by 4939 Members
Latest Member: Lwilliams
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is it a 1969 Z/28? on: March 20, 2015, 08:53:15 PM
Where does the speedometer cable exit the firewall?
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 ce 302 short block on: March 07, 2015, 10:28:26 PM
The add states 302 short block which would indicate that the rotating assembly is included in the price. Still would want more detail about the parts.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 Z/28 at 1967 Indy Winter Nationals. on: January 30, 2015, 08:39:23 PM
Ben is a great guy as well.  I have talked with him a few times at Indy and his brother Dave once. Great guys and a great car.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Anyone heard of Mod top added to 25 th. Z28? on: November 23, 2014, 10:41:15 PM
one more.



Interesting that the trim rings and center caps are on the car.
5  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9N647308 - L72 COPO T0512MN on: September 20, 2014, 10:42:42 PM
When I sold it, it was .060 over with 2 sleeves and some other indications it had a hard life.
6  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9N647308 - L72 COPO T0512MN on: September 20, 2014, 11:35:57 AM
I sold that block in 2006 I believe.  I found it in Eastern Ky at a speed shop, it come out of West Virginia and needed some work.  If I remember correctly, the cast date was in January.
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 VIN on: July 27, 2014, 07:13:17 PM
I always assumed mine was, 124377N254313.
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 rs/ss pillar post paint on: July 27, 2014, 07:08:47 PM
Mine is painted Capri Cream.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different? on: February 22, 2014, 11:25:54 AM
This car has been discussed before.

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=11345.0
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 5 originals rallywheels 67 code DG on: February 10, 2014, 10:28:25 PM
The non SS 67 Camaro rally wheels for disc brakes were 14"x 5" and coded DA.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 5 originals rallywheels 67 code DG on: February 10, 2014, 07:53:47 PM
1967 Camaro wheels for an SS car were 14"x 6" and coded DG.
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Would this considered relatively early build? on: February 02, 2014, 12:28:50 PM
There are 4 different body number sequences at the LA plant, one for standard interior coupes, one for deluxe interior coupes, one for standard interior convertibles, and one for deluxe interior convertibles all running at the same time.  Each sequence started at 1 and worked upward from there, so there are 4 cars with the same body number until one of the sequences ran out of numbers.  Deluxe interior convertible body numbers have the lowest total body numbers at around 2100, and standard interior coupes have the highest total body numbers.  The style trim number would be different on each series of tags, 12437 for standard interior coupe, 12367 for deluxe interior coupe, 12467 for standard interior convertible, and 12667 for deluxe interior convertible.  These numbers are not to be confused with L6 or V8 engine designations like the VIN tag would show, even though the series of numbers appear similar.  Take your VIN and subtract 100K from it, and that is your approximate build number, ie if the VIN is L110645, then your car would have been the 10,645th camaro built at the LA plant, and the 8031st standard interior coupe.

Just a small correction, the deluxe interior coupe would be 12637.
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: I need information on my 68 camaro please on: January 26, 2014, 09:27:00 PM
Factory A/C would rule out being a Z/28.  Appears to be a factory automatic as well which was not an option with a Z/28.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 front seat backs on: January 24, 2014, 08:36:48 PM
That would be correct. Idk of many if any at all 67's that originally had plastic backs.

I have one with original plastic seat backs.  07C build date.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 Camaro Convertible Vin decode on: September 14, 2013, 11:29:02 AM
The vin only shows whether a car was a V8 or  L6 and coupe or convertible.  There will also be a date range to indicate the cowl tag and vin match.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 18 queries.