CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2014, 02:37:41 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97521 Posts in 11718 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different? on: February 22, 2014, 11:25:54 AM
This car has been discussed before.

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=11345.0
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 5 originals rallywheels 67 code DG on: February 10, 2014, 10:28:25 PM
The non SS 67 Camaro rally wheels for disc brakes were 14"x 5" and coded DA.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 5 originals rallywheels 67 code DG on: February 10, 2014, 07:53:47 PM
1967 Camaro wheels for an SS car were 14"x 6" and coded DG.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Would this considered relatively early build? on: February 02, 2014, 12:28:50 PM
There are 4 different body number sequences at the LA plant, one for standard interior coupes, one for deluxe interior coupes, one for standard interior convertibles, and one for deluxe interior convertibles all running at the same time.  Each sequence started at 1 and worked upward from there, so there are 4 cars with the same body number until one of the sequences ran out of numbers.  Deluxe interior convertible body numbers have the lowest total body numbers at around 2100, and standard interior coupes have the highest total body numbers.  The style trim number would be different on each series of tags, 12437 for standard interior coupe, 12367 for deluxe interior coupe, 12467 for standard interior convertible, and 12667 for deluxe interior convertible.  These numbers are not to be confused with L6 or V8 engine designations like the VIN tag would show, even though the series of numbers appear similar.  Take your VIN and subtract 100K from it, and that is your approximate build number, ie if the VIN is L110645, then your car would have been the 10,645th camaro built at the LA plant, and the 8031st standard interior coupe.

Just a small correction, the deluxe interior coupe would be 12637.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: I need information on my 68 camaro please on: January 26, 2014, 09:27:00 PM
Factory A/C would rule out being a Z/28.  Appears to be a factory automatic as well which was not an option with a Z/28.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 front seat backs on: January 24, 2014, 08:36:48 PM
That would be correct. Idk of many if any at all 67's that originally had plastic backs.

I have one with original plastic seat backs.  07C build date.
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 Camaro Convertible Vin decode on: September 14, 2013, 11:29:02 AM
The vin only shows whether a car was a V8 or  L6 and coupe or convertible.  There will also be a date range to indicate the cowl tag and vin match.
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is it a real SS on: May 09, 2013, 07:21:34 PM
Thanks yes I assumed the motor wasn't original however I didn't think it was from a 68,

The partial vin on the stamp pad of the block is for a 68.   Check the casting number of the block, it is most likely a 678 block.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69' Camaro Z28 purchase help PLEASE on: May 08, 2013, 07:05:04 PM
I don't know if it is a re-pop tag or not but there aren't any reasons to re-pop a VN tag.  It only tells you the build date, interior and the paint.  In this case, the color of the car doesn't match the tag. 
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: How rare??? on: March 02, 2013, 05:53:13 PM
Having any 69 camaro painted 63 63 is rare.  From the CRG estimates, .05% of 69 camaros were painted Champagne so if the color distributiuon was consistant  for all production there could have been about 100 69 Z/28's painted Champagne.  This is only a guess as the actual numbers are not known.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Our membership facts and statistics.... Who are we here? on: February 16, 2013, 03:03:45 PM
What if you have more than one?  there are people who own more than one camaro with differing a year of manufacture.  There are a lot of members on both here and team camaro so there could be a similar percentage as the poll there: http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=67652
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 4 Spd Shifter Advise on: December 20, 2012, 01:59:08 PM
Install a hurst competition plus shifter body and attach the Muncie stick.   Would look original in the car and shift better.
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Muncie decode help! on: December 14, 2012, 05:23:17 PM
Could someone please decode these Muncie #'s for me.
Best I can tell it's a M21,  1969?
Coarse spline, single groove

3088336

3925660

P0M05B

101513649

Thanks...

P0M05B would be for a 1970 model year vehicle so the vin is most likely correct.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Rare Camaro on Cars in Barns site on: November 16, 2012, 11:00:00 PM
You forgot to mention thet it also has factory air conditioning.  Nice car for sure.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Exhaust for '67 2 bbl single exhaust on: September 15, 2012, 10:02:43 PM
Just to add, I called some of the exhaust manufacturers as well as some of the restoration parts vendors and there were no sources for the single exhaust.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 18 queries.