CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 28, 2014, 06:24:54 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103603 Posts in 12178 Topics by 4697 Members
Latest Member: greygoose01
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 78
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Help determining 67 4P scenario on: August 25, 2014, 05:29:23 PM
Tag is not coded for A/C.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Help determining 67 4P scenario on: August 25, 2014, 12:10:41 PM
I didn't state there were none. At this time, none are known.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Help determining 67 4P scenario on: August 24, 2014, 03:53:33 PM
An L35 396 would be 4N; too early for L78. No known 4P Z/28s out of Van Nuys.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Help determining 67 4P scenario on: August 24, 2014, 02:16:09 PM
All 1st gens had the cowl punched for the standard speedo cable routing. It was plugged for Muncie applications.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: march built z28 wheel on: August 17, 2014, 04:16:53 PM
YH wheels entered production January 1969.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Broadcast sheets, VIN sequence and build dates on: August 17, 2014, 12:56:58 PM
I have one for a '69 Camaro and it looks like new. Also have other paperwork from the same dealer.

Last fall I saw an original Gutenberg bible, 558 years old. Probably wasn't always well stored but still looked pretty good. Kept dry and indoors, paper does just fine.
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Broadcast sheets, VIN sequence and build dates on: August 17, 2014, 10:44:30 AM
Body and chassis broadcast copies often remained in completed cars shipped from the plant. They were usually discarded during new car prep. However a few dealers put them in the glove box or in the folder of paperwork retained by the dealer. That may be what occurred here as yours looks genuine.
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Caveat Emptor..another on: August 05, 2014, 05:53:29 PM
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Camaro-Z-28-X33-REAL-DEAL-Z-28-ALL-MATCHING-S-DZ-302-4SPD-/141368527122?forcerrptr=true&hash=item20ea388912&item=141368527122&pt=US_Cars_Trucks
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Caveat Emptor on: July 27, 2014, 12:08:37 PM
Wow!

Great work getting it pulled guys!
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Caveat Emptor on: July 26, 2014, 11:01:55 AM
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-VERY-RARE-HIGHLY-DOCUMENTED-PRISTINE-TOTALLY-RESTORED-SHOWROOM-CONIDITION-/151365002981?forcerrptr=true&hash=item233e0ea6e5&item=151365002981&pt=US_Cars_Trucks

This ebay ad prominently mentions documents and features several photos of them. The alleged ‘original’ documents have several inconsistencies with genuine original 1969 Camaro documentation.

Exception Control Letters [ECL] are the two-character alpha codes listed after the option; A01 is tinted glass, AA is the ECL for the specific build. ECLs are application-specific; there are at least 22 for Z22. 5 of the ECLs on the documents for this car are inconsistent with others in the database. In addition there are two spelling errors and an error in the listing of the options.

The ad states: “The window sticker and shipper sheet reflect…and the D80 rear [?] spoiler option” however air spoiler equipment is not listed on the paperwork, such as it is. The car has C08 Vinyl Roof Cover and Z21 Style Trim Group, also not listed on the purported original documents. The ad claims a stereo radio but the documents list the U69 monaural am/fm.

There are several incorrect or missing components evident in the photos: headers, no AIR system, master cylinder, trunk mat, stripe color, ducted hood.

The ad boasts “Send your inspector today!” I second that motion.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Air cleaner Decal needed on: July 22, 2014, 06:57:04 PM
Check out a more modern ZL1 dyno test on the engine from #26:

http://www.camaros.org/copo.shtml

With today's 0 weight racing oils and the latest piston ring technology Camaro Hi-Performance is seeing 550hp+ on their ZL1 rebuilds.


12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Air cleaner Decal needed on: July 21, 2014, 12:40:31 PM
The only 430 hp engine of the timeframe was the L88, only placed by Chevrolet in Corvettes, and it did not use an air cleaner decal.. as the 'hood itself' was the top cover for the Air cleaner.. Smiley



The ZL1 was also rated at 430 hp. The few period engine bay photos of ZL1 Camaros show either no air cleaner lid decal or just the 427 crossed flags.
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: NOS Rear shock absorber P1132 on: July 06, 2014, 04:16:11 PM
Camaro SS equipment did include different chassis components, mostly heavier-duty springs. I believe '69 was the 1st year spring selection in production was based on option content/weight. There was an optional F41 Special-Purpose suspension; Chevy was vague as to what that included. However service replacement shock listings mention 'Spec Perf Susp' so that may have been the difference.

Would be nice to have a CBC for an F41 car.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: NOS Rear shock absorber P1132 on: July 05, 2014, 12:45:11 PM
Parts cars, ebay, swap meets. Very tough to find. Replacement shocks were heavily marketed in the '70s so many OE shocks were quickly replaced. Sometimes worn out but I believe they can be rebuilt. Corvette guys have been doing this for decades. You would not believe what a bud paid for a used set of '65 Corvette F41s dated to his car.

15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: NOS Rear shock absorber P1132 on: July 05, 2014, 11:58:31 AM
Service replacement parts are often more generic than OE to cover a broader range of application.

For '69 model year production 2 rear shock absorber codes have been seen on cars built with 12 bolt axles; TN for automatics [3192832] UN for manual transmissions [3192851]. We have seen one anomaly for each code. If GMPD serviced those numbers it wasn't for long; they are not listed in the October '69 P & A manual. The generic service 12 bolt rear shock at that time appears to be 3182033.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 78
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.292 seconds with 18 queries.