CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 19, 2014, 05:52:34 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107494 Posts in 12505 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Need some pics for the home page!!! on: October 12, 2009, 11:20:17 PM
Steve,

Here is a recent photo:



2  Site Comments / Discussion / Test Drive / test on: May 27, 2008, 11:01:48 PM
test
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Bench test AM radio on: March 02, 2008, 02:20:14 AM
Also, if you plan to play with it a bit, use an 8-10 ohm speaker.  The 4 ohm speakers commonly available will draw too much current and ruin your output transistor.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Rick's new catalog on: November 13, 2007, 11:57:43 PM
I'm not trying to start a flame war here.

I live in Seattle, and have ordered from Ricks for years.  It always bothered me that when I input my zip code, then entered parts, the shipping was very expensive.  And I understand that, it's a long way.

But, I just ordered a couple things a few weeks ago, and the shipping was very quick, and a much cheeper.  I got the parts right away and the shipping charges were < 20% of the total price of the parts.  It usually costs me an additional 30 - 50% for shipping.

Examples:
Before Ecklers - $157 worth of brake components cost $62 to ship.
After Ecklers - $105 worth of brake parts cost $17 to ship.

And, they came in a few days, not 5-6 business days like before.

Yes, I know that they wern't the exact parts, and this wasn't a scientific experiment where the same parts were ordered before and after. 

But I'm very happy with Ricks, they have the most correct parts, and best technical support of any place I have ordered from.

Just my 2 cents.  By the way, I work in the marine industry and have no affiliation with Ricks or Ecklers.

Dave
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 12 Bolt QK Code Rear End on: November 23, 2006, 11:37:09 PM
Thanks ccargo,

I'll add the info to my file for the car.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 67 12 Bolt QK Code Rear End on: November 23, 2006, 01:33:46 PM
I just pulled the rear end on my 01D SS-350.

Getting new bearings, seals, clutches, etc.

When I look at the stamping  QK 0103 G  (next line E) it doesn't appear to be perfectly lined up.

Does this look legitimate to you guys?  I haven't looked at a lot of these

Thanks for any input.

Dave
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Members from old forum version please post here on: October 19, 2005, 09:40:19 PM
Doug,

I was on the old forum as offrapel, and on the new forum as offrapel too.

Thanks,

Dave
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 19 queries.