CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 22, 2014, 12:46:04 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103348 Posts in 12156 Topics by 4692 Members
Latest Member: smschaul
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: trim ring fit to rim on: January 26, 2014, 12:25:27 PM
rszmjt,
I was not questioning the originality of your instruction sheet; I was noting the printed date on the ebay listing that 69Z28-RS posted. If there are others that have your date or other later printed sheets, I would say that Chevy did put the 4 clip designs on the early 69 Z/28’s and maybe we could use this information to help track a date change to the second design. Especially if someone has a later sheet showing the internal fingers.

There have been numerous posts about trim rings recently, with different people offering information about what trim rings are on their cars. I will see if I can correlate this information similar to the gas tank codes and post what I find. If anyone else has done this already feel free to post.

Mike
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: trim ring fit to rim on: January 25, 2014, 06:48:57 PM
The printed date on that paper is 9-23-66 and can be found at all the Corvette places. Does anyone have one with a later date like 1969.

Mike
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: trim ring fit to rim on: January 24, 2014, 08:59:44 PM
I agree, that is one of my pet peeves about restoring Camaro's.

Mike
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: intake manifold date code on: January 01, 2014, 11:00:55 AM
4.4.69 on a 425DZ

Mike
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: air cleaner on: December 30, 2013, 12:59:46 PM
I can bring mine over and we can compare the different parts.

Mike
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 15" Trim Rings on: October 23, 2013, 11:23:42 AM
From the input it looks like the 4 clips were installed at the factory most if not all of the production cycle.

What would be correct in Legends judging? Any input from judges or someone who has gone through the process? Thanks.

Mike
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: goodyear polyglas tires on: October 23, 2013, 06:26:07 AM
I think the "drifting to the right" is from back in the day when most roads were two lane with a crown in the center to drain off water. Four and more lanes today don't have a crown, think a banked NASCAR track. The book settings are from 1969, a good alignment guy should be able to recommend settings that will work with your car on todays roads.

In my previous post I didn't mean to imply my car is all over the road, just not as precise as todays cars with radial tires. It is still way fun to drive...

Mike
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1969 15" Trim Rings on: October 22, 2013, 01:18:10 PM
I have searched and found out there were three designs for the 15" trim rings. The first is with the 4 outside clips, then 2 designs with full circumference internal clips. I would like to find out what date were the 4 clips were used till, and what is acceptable for Legends Judging. My car is a 5A and has 2 of each style? Thanks.

Mike
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: goodyear polyglas tires on: October 22, 2013, 12:56:32 PM
You would want the full weight of the car on the suspension before the upper and lower control arm bolts are tightened. There are serrations on the ends of the bushings that will bite in place when the bolts are tightened.

After my frame off, where everything is tight and aligned right. Using the Goodyear’s, you kind travel in the general direction of where the front end is pointed. It certainly not like any new car of today but that is the fun part of driving a car that is 44 years old.

Mike
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD on: September 26, 2013, 06:48:41 AM
The noted damage is interesting, wonder if the broken motor mount had anything to do with putting the car in the water.

Mike
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD on: September 06, 2013, 07:39:09 AM
38,000  Z/28's are still on the road.
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Cylinder heads on: January 17, 2013, 08:03:23 AM
Did you try Camaro Specialties? Last time I was there they had a pretty good selection of singles and pairs of heads,   http://www.camaros.com/
Mike
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring Original Ball Joints on: December 01, 2012, 03:53:00 PM
Those were my pictures of the ball joints. I boosted the boots from the Classic Suspension ball joints and installed them on my originals. Thought I could find some replacements later, doesn't sound like it.

Mike
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: SBC Hump Heads on: November 03, 2012, 11:20:18 AM
You might ask the seller to take the heads out and get them checked for cracks before you make the trip. Offer to pay for the check as you would do this any way and you might save the cost of the road trip.
Mike
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Muncie gears on: September 05, 2012, 07:17:26 AM
I think these guys are the suppliers that everyone buys from for the good stuff.

http://autogear.net/ag_archive/muncieproducts.htm

Good guys to work with, lots of knowledge.

Mike
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 18 queries.