CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 19, 2014, 05:49:52 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107494 Posts in 12505 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 31
376  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 AM/FM and rear antenna on: January 03, 2008, 11:46:34 AM
Thanks for the info.  Here is a link to a picture of a 67 AM/FM on Ebay which confirms what you are saying about how to identify. 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=140194541108&indexURL=0&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting

I am not looking to buy a radio, but I have a 67 with an AM/FM with rear antenna.  I am trying to figure out if the AM/FM was added at a later date.

Well as been stated, the rear antenna is an AM radio only option, so either the am/fm was added or the rear antenna. A little detective is all it takes.
377  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 AM/FM and rear antenna on: January 03, 2008, 11:17:00 AM
Just want to correct my above post. 1967 am/fm were part# 986824 and 68 were 7303241. If the tags are missing the easiest way to tell is 1967 radios have no am/fm on the lens near the switch and 1968 does have am/fm on the lens by the slide switch.
378  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 AM/FM and rear antenna on: January 03, 2008, 10:48:29 AM
I believe on a 67 there are dashes between the numbers. For instance on FM dial 102 -104 - 106 and 68 just had  102  104  106. Its been a while since i investigated this but there are differences between the dial script. Hopefully someone can confirm....
379  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Gear reduction unit on: January 01, 2008, 02:03:03 PM
And I think that with an 9 tooth drive gear, the car doesn't neet the adapter at all (like John's car).

That would be my guess as well. I don't have any data on 9 tooth drive gears utilizing a reducer. Each transmissions has a part# tag that designated its build configuration. If 9 tooth drive gear transmissions did not need adapter/reducer in high numerical gear applications then why wouldn't they install transmissions configured as such based on the part# tag. Assuming that the pn tag/brass tag in fact provided a configuration/BOM for the trans.
380  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Yellow marking on smog pump on: January 01, 2008, 01:16:04 PM
I have looked at many cars both big block and small block built first week of production of 69 and none have had the relief valve.
381  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Gear reduction unit on: January 01, 2008, 11:14:11 AM
I believe 22 tooth Driven Gear will work with that adapter.
382  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Gear reduction unit on: January 01, 2008, 10:32:43 AM
The key is transmission drive gear teeth. If your transmission has a 8 tooth drive gear the following should work for
4.10 Rear Axle,  F70-14 Tires, 8 tooth Drive Gear (P/N 3924098), 20 tooth Driven Gear (P/N 3860343),  Adapter P/N 6476736. This is good for 3 or 4 speed transmission.
383  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Exhaust Systems on: December 31, 2007, 07:40:52 PM
As been mentioned the Gardner system is a near perfect replication of the original and the way to go if your planning to have the car judged. If you are not necessarily into original and want more of a performance system the American Thunder by Flowmaster gives you a good value. The flowmaster system is not close to original, although the tail pipes give you an original type look. 
384  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Gear reduction unit on: December 31, 2007, 11:58:25 AM
I believe I answered my own question "The transmission drive gears you mention 8&9 tooth, was 16 also used? "

The 16 tooth drive gear was used in the Turbo Hydramatic application.
385  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Gear reduction unit on: December 31, 2007, 09:45:21 AM
Another isssue that comes into play is the drive gear on the main shaft.  There are two, 8 and 9 tooth.  In my 35+ years of rebuilding Muncies, I have seen both used for the same model year application.

Jerry

I agree with you and Kurt regarding the use of the reducer "The use of the reducer involved a couple of variables such as tire size and transmission shaft/speedo gear as well." (driven/drive gears)

The transmission drive gears you mention 8&9 tooth, was 16 also used?

I have a listing of reducers which shows it was possible to have one on a 373 gear car as well. Have you seen any used on any 15" wheel applications such as z28's and Yenkos?


BTW everyone have a safe and happy New Year
386  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: CONSOLE GAUGE LOW FUEL MODULE on: December 30, 2007, 10:09:55 PM
You got it. I had a lot of fun isolating that problem. Grin
387  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Black Z28/RS Grill on: December 30, 2007, 09:30:32 PM
I'm finally getting around to correcting a few restoration issues on my '69 Z28/RS.  It's black with white stripe as original.  Only problem is the previous owner did not paint the grill the original Argent color.

Can someone tell me how much of the grill was Argent?  Is the entire area within the chrome trim around the grill what needs to be Argent?

In the case of black RS cars they received a silver grill (all other cars received black rs grills). Original silver grill plastic was tan/grey color and then painted silver from the front side. The silver coverage was complete looking from the front side, however from the back side you could still see the tan plastic on the outer edges.

If you have a black grill, you may want to paint the whole grill  tan/grey color first and then apply the finish silver.   
388  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: CONSOLE GAUGE LOW FUEL MODULE on: December 30, 2007, 09:18:05 PM
I don't understand how the low fuel module could be attributed to a defective oil pressure gauge. The gauge is mechanical. The only electrical in the oil pressure gauge is the light buib.

Ed

The bulb actually touched the oil gauges copper band. That curved band deflects proportional to the oil pressure. Since the bulb was touching the band (mechanically interfered), limiting how much it could deflect, hence limiting oil pressure reading to 20lbs.

389  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Gear reduction unit on: December 30, 2007, 07:20:36 PM
Would a 1969 L78 Camaro  with M20 and 410 rear come with a gear reduction unit? If so what is the part number?

410 4spd cars with 14 inch wheels received speedo reducer.

Interesting to note that cars equipped with 15" wheels such as Z28's and 9737  (sports car conversion) did not.  The use of the reducer involved a couple of variables such as tire size and transmission shaft/speedo gear as well.
390  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: CONSOLE GAUGE LOW FUEL MODULE on: December 30, 2007, 07:10:15 PM
The low fuel module does have what looks like a bulb socket(DO NOT INSTALL BULB). A friend of mine had just purchased a car and asked me to check it over, well what I found was that it had low oil pressure. After some diagnostics I found the previous owner had in fact installed a bulb in the low fuel module, which caused a mechanical interference with the oil pressure gauge, limiting the oil gauge from reading any higher than 20lbs.
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 31
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.097 seconds with 18 queries.