|
286
|
Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: N/66 option phase-out for 1969 Camaro production
|
on: July 30, 2007, 03:27:09 PM
|
John's answer about Corvette judging is the same as Camaro. The cars have to be restored to the way they left the plant. No add ons, if you add them, there are points taken off. Many like to install that engine mount recall kit. If we see one on a car, there is a point deduction. If you add spoilers and they were not factory installed, there will be a point deduction.
If you have the window sticker to the vehicle or dealer invoice, the car must match in every option.
Jerry
Just so I understand. how do judges deal with cars that do not have documentation? For example, does a car have to have a D-80 on the trim tag to have spoilers even though not every car equipped with a spoiler had the D-80 on the trim tag (like LA cars)? I'm a realist, many more cars now exist with spoilers and cowl hoods than ever left the factory (very popular add on through the ages) but, just as grounded in reality, that doesn't mean that every car that has a spoiler and lacks documentation didn't leave the factory that way...so how do judges cope with such items when judging? In the case above with the N66 wheels, the car would have to be built in the time period the option was available first. Also the installation of the option would have to be identical to factory. In the case of cowl induction hood the relay, hole above fuse box and accelerator linkage would be check proper location and originality of components. Regarding the dealer installed items. That opens up a can of worms itself, for instance was this item an RPO or over the counter. My take is that over the counter items were NOT a factory item ( RPO) and shouldn't be considered in a" Original Judged Class/Factory Born Class". If the option that was added was an available option during that cars build period, and they have real verifiable documentation that the deal installed it fron new,then I feel some consideration should be given. If I owned a car with over the counter items and accessories, I would have it judged without first and then add the option or accessory as I see fit. This is only my opinion, and also feel the more exceptions made, the more diluted judging becomes.
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: oval floor pan plugs
|
on: July 19, 2007, 09:48:28 AM
|
|
I have observed on most original car that have been certified through the Vintage Camaro (survivor class at Carlisle) to have some degree of exterior color overspray on the underside floors pans. This overspray has been found on both the sealant and plugs. I have never seen primer on the plug or sealant just body color. Another item to note is that the adhesion property of the plated plugs is very poor and in many cases some of the paint has come off. Also the degree of body overspray on the floor boards themselve varies quite a bit, therefore varying the amount on the plugs/sealant. Remember this is not a black and white issue as I stated some cars will have alot of overspray and some may have very little if any left after 38 + years.
I will review my photo files and look for very clear examples, one that comes to mind is Don S.'s 69 HO Yenko. That car had an amazing underside, that was very well preserved and showed the overspray very well.
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Do Heat Shields Work?
|
on: July 07, 2007, 10:06:51 AM
|
|
Does the solenoid engage or click, if so it is probably starter related. I know John Perkle installs bigger motor windings when he rebuilds starters.
Also I have had solenoid issues where it wouldn't even click when hot. The tolerances between the plunger and coils closed up due to heat expansion and wouldn't allow the plunger to engage. That was a simple fix, I purchased a hi temp solenoid from MCCP Ron 815-648-1700.
|
|
|
|
|
291
|
Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Paint for Hockey Stick Stripe and Rear of S.S.
|
on: July 03, 2007, 11:36:25 AM
|
Well I have had numerous sets of white and black NOS door stripes including the ones I just put on my car and they are not exactly high gloss, but I dont think they were meant to be. The fender stripe on my car when I bought it in 1980 was orig and it was gloss black. The door stripes are close but not as glossy as the paint. I still have a few sets left over somewhere in my pile of parts. I bought some of them in 81 from the dealer. My original rockers had the orig paint on them and they were more like a 30-40% gloss.
Regarding black tail panels and rockers, the original paint cars I have inspected an owned have been semi gloss, say 70-80% gloss. This issue has been debated for ever. I believe many semi gloss tail panels have been polished over the years and this tends to make them appear gloss.
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Paint for Hockey Stick Stripe and Rear of S.S.
|
on: July 02, 2007, 09:09:29 PM
|
John,
As everybody knows, the D/90 stripe utilized a tape section for the doors. I've never actually seen an NOS set of door stripes so I don't know if they are gloss, semi-gloss, etc.. Also, how well did the painted portion ( on the front fenders ) match the gloss level of the door stripes? I probably should have paid attention to this years ago. When I restored my '69, I had the stripes painted on ( doors as well ) because none of the dealers could get me the door stripes and/or the front fender masks. Funny how they later showed up on eBay 20+ years later.
Steve
It is difficult to tell the the tape on the door and the paint on the fender. I had a couple nos stripe kits and they were definitely gloss.
|
|
|
|
|
298
|
Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: VT
|
on: April 20, 2007, 01:13:27 PM
|
|
This tragedy has touch everyone to certain degree. It really hit home for me because I had worked closely with Professor Kevin Granata. Our company provided many of his research tools. A brilliant researcher in the biomechanics field. Sad , very sad....
|
|
|
|
|
|