CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 31, 2015, 10:36:03 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
111440 Posts in 12830 Topics by 4913 Members
Latest Member: devodave
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 32
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Our Beloved JohnZ has a B-Day today! on: February 27, 2015, 05:09:34 PM
Happy Birthday John, we appreciate everything you do and share.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Ebay 69 Z/28?? on: February 06, 2015, 09:28:19 AM
Everyone loves documentation but it can also be used to recreate cars like this car and the rallye green rs/z at BJ.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Ebay 69 Z/28?? on: February 05, 2015, 11:06:48 PM
I will only say train wreck with every issue imaginable.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Z28 registry on: February 02, 2015, 05:58:49 PM
I sent an E-mail today to Larry Eakin and asked if the site is still active or dormant.  Will post status when and if I receive a reply.

Larry had two really nice unrestored 68's a RS/Z28 Sea Frost Green and a RS/L78 Corvette Bronze that we certified in 2003 & 2004. The last contact I had with him he sold both cars and more or less was out of the hobby at that time. That was 8+ years ago. I will contact him and see if anything has changed. 
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Ron Pratte collection on: January 16, 2015, 10:19:31 AM
If we assume that when it was certified, it was as a rebodied/restoration drivetrain vehicle as indicated by the second and final certification. The  professional appraisal value was 100,000-120,000 in 2008. No one on this site questioned the appraisal value then.... I don't know why, to me it was virtually worthless unless you collect documentation.  So logically if it was worth what it appraised for in 2008 at 100-120K, then based on the increased value in cars 148K is not unrealistic in today market.

Again the car has very little value whether it was in 2008 or 2015. There is nothing original and should be valued at nicely restored clone cars...but that's just my opinion.

6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Engine Pad Check on: December 25, 2014, 11:40:02 AM

I'd forgotten your engine was assembled the same day as mine.. Smiley    How often do we get to compare three identical DZ stampings? Smiley

And they all match Smiley  Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays everyone!
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Engine Pad Check on: December 23, 2014, 07:06:56 PM
Real as rain. Here's my 9A
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Muscle Car and Corvette National November 22 & 23 Chicago on: November 19, 2014, 10:59:23 PM
This event is being held this weekend at the Stephenson Convention Ctr in Chicago, IL. For more information visit our website at

The Vintage team will be certifying these time capsules. Please stop by and see what the program is all about

Vintage Certification Entries MCACN 2014:

1966 Chevelle SS L78 White
1966 Chevelle SS L78 Black
1966 Chevelle SS L35 Black
1978 Pace Car L82
1970 Olds W30 automatic
1970 Olds W30 4 Spd
1969 Z28
1963 Impala
1969 Nova L78
1974 Camaro Z28/LT
1971 Cuda 440 six pack
1970 Hemi Cuda 19k miles
1970 AAR Cuda
1971 Corvette
1967 Indy Pace Car (actual track car)

Heritage Display:
1969 Camaro Z28
1967 Chevelle SS with fact 488's
1969 COPO Chevelle
1963 Impala with 11 miles
1967 L35 Pace Car
1967 GTO HO

We have expanded our judging team which has allowed us to accept a few more cars for certification. A great area exclusively for unrestored cars which provides like minded owners to meet and discuss their cars and share their knowledge.

This is just an amazing line up of cars and judging team.

BTW we are now certifying the original Indy Pace Car!!! this show is going to be amazing thanks to efforts of Bob Ashton and all who are participating.....

Vintage Certification website

9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: amazing 69 Chevelle SS true survivor on: November 17, 2014, 09:19:25 AM
I would remove them and return the car as delivered. Obviously they are part of the history and perhaps why the cars exterior is so well preserved. I doubt the new owner will need them as probably very few miles will be put on the car. I wouldn't do it right away but I think in the end I'd remove and store them for another owner.

There is and exception for me, one of my survivor cars was not optioned with gauges and the orig owner installed a set of after market. I left them installed because I feel its important to monitor the engine.
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: on the Velocity Channel! on: October 16, 2014, 03:33:10 PM
Steve does excellent work. I've used him for close to 20 years and always happy. Easy to wok with and quick turn around.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Fuel pumps on: September 15, 2014, 02:06:39 PM
That's a good question, I approached it last year with no luck. Was looking for the GPM on a stock/replacement pump.

You won't find a GPM rating chart - the number on the pump is primarily for the pump configuration, essentially the bottom half; where are the inlet and outlet, which way do they point, are they clamped or threaded joints, etc. Shop Manual calls for the same volume for the same time for all pumps.

John:  You said 'primarily' for configuration; Does that mean that if there's a PN difference, that there's some difference in the I/O configuration alignment, orientation, or fitting size/type?  OR is there something else to know about this?   

There are many instances where externally pumps are configured identical but have different part#'s (built in same time period). Therefore I believe internally, output (volume/pressure) was also a reason for different part#'s.
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Ebay gas cap on: September 15, 2014, 07:53:09 AM
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Final adjustment on RS Headlight doors on: August 08, 2014, 11:12:53 AM
As Charley suggested, in the past I've tweeked the bracket to get the door to close the last 1/4 inch.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Delco-Moraine rear wheel cylinder on: July 07, 2014, 08:16:34 PM
Wagner kit F46347 , Napa 418 and Dorman has a kit.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Oil Pressure Gauge Block Sender Fitting on: June 23, 2014, 04:25:12 PM
Will the oil line caps from the reproduction oil lines fit that fitting that Dave posted the same as original? Looks like I'm in the market for another block fitting then. The one at HBC is the correct fitting in reproduction? I believe I have a reproduction oil line from Ricks as a spare and one that is currently on my car now, also from Ricks should fit the HBC fitting then?

On my orange Z I had to replace the line and the reproduction tapered fitting seemed a little oversized (didn't seat very deep), so I bought a 1/8" fitting kit from Advance Auto locally which had compression fittings.  I cut the end and installed, which worked perfect. I did it as precaution, however the repop may work fine.

Steve, you mean this fitting kit correct? Shouldn't be an issue using the nylon oil line. I'm thinking the oil line kit I got from Ricks in 2000 has the small ferrule already on the oil line as apposed to the bigger one your speaking of on the current oil line kit. Or should I use a new ferrule? 

See how deep the ferrule seats. The concern I had was only a couple of threads caught so I used the ferrule from the kit pictured. Sounds like you should be good to go....
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 32
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.35 seconds with 18 queries.