CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 24, 2014, 04:38:44 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105715 Posts in 12341 Topics by 4754 Members
Latest Member: Jake
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Holley 3910 on: July 22, 2014, 04:49:53 PM
I'd keep looking
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Trunk Lid Identification on: July 03, 2014, 01:34:19 PM
The early 67 deck lids  also had the oval hole in the center like the nos ones do
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Trunk Lid Identification on: June 28, 2014, 03:03:40 PM
 That is an early 67 deck lid. Need a full pic to tell just how early
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What's it worth, untouched Cortez silver 69 RS Z on: June 25, 2014, 09:40:13 AM
I must be missing something here . I own a body shop and have restored  many camaros and have a few of my own. I also own a 69 RS Z flat hood no spoiler . Any body that pays more than 5K  for that car is nuts
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Multiplex on: April 16, 2014, 04:13:46 PM
You will find that in the assy manual . They were located in three different places. under the dash, on the front of the console and on the rear of the console
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Hood Part numbers on: January 01, 2014, 02:16:58 PM
correct no drain holes
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Hood Part numbers on: January 01, 2014, 12:33:53 PM
Here is a real nos 67 ss hood 3898129
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Did 67 door skin edges have seam sealer? on: October 12, 2013, 04:19:53 PM
Sauron is right Maybe a little solvent to smooth it out and they will look great
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Re-upholstering '67 front seats on: October 12, 2013, 04:16:25 PM
I agree with the wife  Just pay someone who knows what they are doing and you do something else on the car that you know what to do
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Kick panel speaker grill question. on: September 27, 2013, 08:46:23 PM
They are not camaro grills for sure
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 Camaro RS SS Conv. Interior Trim color . on: September 11, 2013, 05:58:53 AM
It is black
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 parchment interior? on: July 22, 2013, 09:37:24 AM
It does look odd  next to a black headliner. I believe the front headliner trim  is also white
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 parchment interior? on: July 22, 2013, 06:11:59 AM
Ed some 68 hard tops had the w/s pillar post white and the windlace that runs along the edge of the headliner along with the rear window trin white. I know he asked about a convt.  Being there were two white int's. in 68 maybe the pearl one was different than the ivory when it come to the pieces I'm  talking about
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 Camaro SS Hood/ Underhood Lamp on: June 15, 2013, 09:06:40 PM
The one in the pic is an nos one I got from ebay. A couple years back. I think I got it for 125.00
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 Camaro SS Hood/ Underhood Lamp on: June 13, 2013, 12:08:29 PM
Welcome Jerry, 67 under hood lamps are different than 68 & 69 . They only have one mounting screw and are mounted turned around as you can see in the pic.  Small block on the left side and big block on the right. The 67's are tuff to find so you may have to use the later ones
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 18 queries.