CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 23, 2014, 03:30:08 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104717 Posts in 12247 Topics by 4719 Members
Latest Member: Baconcks
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34
466  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Power steer pump cap on: May 18, 2006, 08:23:19 PM
Don't know that this will clarify things any but the 5690846 was definitely used for the 67 & 68 years and was superceded in May of 70 with part number 7803820.

Steve
467  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Driver side mirror on: April 27, 2006, 08:06:18 PM
thesupernova86

Looks like the original part number for a 68 Camaro ourside mirror gasket was 3927398

Steve
468  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396: Smog Diverter Valve "Broadcast code" question ?? on: March 29, 2006, 08:04:00 PM
Kevin

Regarding your 3/26/06 post.  I think it depends on your vehicle date compared to the part date that determines "replacement" (service) parts vs. original production parts that one might have on a car.   Huh  By that I mean if a part was superceded during a cars production it was a new part showing up on the line and in the parts department as a service replacement for vehicles already out the door.  BTW, in your chart regarding the 5 digit #'s the 7028299 - should be "28299" and 7036448 would be "36448" I think.

It appears you got a "left over" 28299 packaged in a 7036448 box which may relate back to JohnZ 3/26 post Smiley

Steve
469  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396: Smog Diverter Valve "Broadcast code" question ?? on: March 25, 2006, 07:27:00 PM
Ed

Almost.  I'm not sure the 7024764 number is the "original" number but that would be logical.  I think it could be one of several at this point.  There does not seem to be a supercede date for the 4764 to the 7028299 though but it obviously continued to be used past 5/68 in my case.

Steve
470  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396: Smog Diverter Valve "Broadcast code" question ?? on: March 25, 2006, 04:58:09 PM

Ed

It's the same as what you had......"68 ALL (396)

Steve
471  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396: Smog Diverter Valve "Broadcast code" question ?? on: March 25, 2006, 04:32:00 PM
Ed

7036448 actually replaced by 7028299 in May of 68.  I find it interesting that the part books (so far) don't show the 7024764 but it's in the AIM and it's what is on my original and unmolested 396 Smiley  I love stuff like this Cheesy

Steve
472  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396: Smog Diverter Valve "Broadcast code" question ?? on: March 25, 2006, 02:39:43 PM
Kevin

You might want to review this thread.  http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=396.0   The 7024764 has also been showing up on 396's.

Steve
473  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct intake for L30 on: March 25, 2006, 02:15:51 PM
Looks like the original part number was 3931575.  Used for all 68's with 4BC 327 & 350 engines except special high perf ones.  Rochester carb was used with this manifold originally too.

Steve
474  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 SS Hubcaps on: March 20, 2006, 06:42:25 PM
Note they are 65 Nova covers.  The part number has been used for more than one year and that may be why we are seeing different covers for different years on different vehicles.  At this point I suspect that the paint scheme changed for the year and the vehicle it was going to be used for in that particular year.

Steve
475  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Diverter Valves on: February 28, 2006, 09:39:50 PM
mr396

Looking at your picture, place yourself on the left side looking straight on at the valve end.  Now look at the area below the valve body and on the part 90 degrees to the body that has the bolts that attach the valve to the orange bracket.  Look for 5 digits (facing the front).  These digits are the "valve" numbers.  Looking at it as in your picture.....the numbers are just below the vacuum line and 90 degrees to the left on the vertical shaft which is behind the bolt head.

Steve
476  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Diverter Valves on: February 23, 2006, 08:04:00 PM
mr396

Would you mind checking the location of that number for us and reporting back.  The reason I ask is because there is the diverter valve (with a #) and attached to it is an extension (with a #).  The valve number is right next to where the extension and valve bolt together and the extension number is at the other end of where they bolt together.  Please recheck the number "2" in the 702 part also to see if it could be a "3".  Thanks!

Steve
477  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Please see picture of my 327 - question on originality on: February 11, 2006, 03:51:25 PM
DonSTP

When you say you want to "bring it back to original" that probably means different things to many of us.  Can you be a little more specific in what you're wanting to accomplish?  Did you say what year the car is?  I may have missed that but some basic info would help.  Manual or automatic?  3/4 speed?  Power steering?  For instance, you no doubt already know the rad cap and plug wires are not original just from their appearance but we are not able to help you with thing like the carb without numbers.  Are you going to add smog equipment if 67-69?  Take more pictures from different angles and post them.

Steve
478  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 SS350 Waterpump and Distrib on: February 09, 2006, 08:00:24 PM
jidc

My source shows part number 3890017 (Colvin cast number ='s 3782608) as the original water pump part number for you.  The distributor as 168.

Steve
479  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Diverter Valves on: February 08, 2006, 07:54:55 PM
Yes it helps ccargo Smiley  The more info the better!!  Dean, do you mean 28469 instead?  The 24765 is the # given in the 68 AM.  I think it is a valid valve for the 68 Z.  By the way, I am not saying that the CRG table is not correct in any way.

Steve
480  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1968 Diverter Valves on: February 07, 2006, 08:31:03 PM
With regard to the camaros.org/coolingsystems report.  I have been looking into the question of just how valid the 68 part numbers are that are provided in the assembly manual (AM).  I want to say up front that I think Kurt did a nice job on the his (CRG) Report and I mean no disrespect to him or the work with what I've put in the attached table for folks to review.  While there are typo's in the AM part numbers I think that we can generally accept them as accurate until proven otherwise.  I've put together a table of valves that I could find in the 68 manual and some support info found in the AM for each where I found it.  Even though I can't find supportive info for each, as is the case for the Z28, I think that the fact it is in the manual is good enough for us to use for the hobby and think it's not unreasonable to utilize it in a list of numbers when "checking" valves.
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 18 queries.