CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 21, 2015, 04:07:17 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112159 Posts in 12884 Topics by 4933 Members
Latest Member: MCrum
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 35
451  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 68 RS center grille on: August 23, 2006, 09:32:55 PM
Ed

Grin Thats funny!  It's also interesting as the right side was not substituted until 10/68 so they must have been anticipating the change over in the P&A 9/68 printing since it was so close.  Either that or you have discovered that the engineers were going to use the 68 headlight cover on the 69 model year Wink but.......

Steve
452  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Camaro won't start on: August 23, 2006, 09:17:18 PM
Do you hear any "clicking" at the starter when you turn the key?

Steve
453  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 68 RS center grille on: August 23, 2006, 09:15:14 PM
It does appear that the 060 had replaced the 841 part by 9/68.  What do you show for 3898135 and 3919063?  Are they still separate in 9/68 P&A?
454  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / 1968 Rally Sport grille research on: August 23, 2006, 08:36:07 PM
Ed

Would you mind checking your 68 P&A (date) for me in 1.266 and see if the 67 center grille (3921841) is still listed separately from the 68 center grille (3919060) or if they have been listed as 67-68 w/ RS center .....3919060 at the point of your P&A printing.  I'm curious about something and would appreciate your checking for me.  Thanks!!

Steve
455  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct intake manifold code on: August 05, 2006, 08:26:33 PM
Mark

I'm confused.  What intake manifold do you believe is on the car now?

Steve
456  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Coil spring spacers for 67-69 Air Conditioned Camaro's? on: August 05, 2006, 07:50:46 PM
For what it's worth....

Part#                           Status
474682                      Removed from service January 1971
36947719                  Removed from service December 1968
3656476 & 3722769   Still in service in January 1971

Steve                   
457  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct intake manifold code on: August 01, 2006, 07:19:24 PM
Mark

Are you able to see any numbers on the bottom of the intake?  If so, what are they?

Steve
458  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 z/28 full floating connecting rods - Fact or Fiction on: July 30, 2006, 08:57:01 PM
"1965 - 69 Chevrolet by the numbers" says for 1969 302/290 piston pin was floating pin.

Steve
459  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 68 l78 pulley question on: July 26, 2006, 06:47:51 PM
copojo & Marty

I'm the original owner of my 68 which still has the original L78 engine and attachments/components.  The pulley has the # and CV on it.

Steve
460  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Replacing horn and cap on: July 10, 2006, 06:28:42 PM
Great!!  I wondered how things turned out.  Glad to hear you got it working. 

Steve
461  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: clutch rod on: July 08, 2006, 09:52:33 PM
Arno

I believe the confusion is with the shop manual using the language " 2 piece rod on a Camaro V8".  It's just to general a statement in this case.  The Parts Books clarify it well.  The Camaro V8 (8 cyl except the 396's) use the 2 piece and the 396's use a one piece design.  6 cyl's also use a 1 piece design.

Steve
462  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Camaro booster numbers on: July 04, 2006, 11:35:43 AM
Brian

The part number for 67 Camaro drum was (Bendix 2505735) 3918715, (Moraine) 5462049, (Moraine with metallic linings) 5463133.  67 with disk brakes (Moraine) 5458828.

Steve
463  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Replacing horn and cap on: June 29, 2006, 07:26:18 PM
dab67

The "donut" must be installed in the cap for the horn to work as it makes contact with the concave metal piece sitting in the bottom part of the center of the wheel.  When you push on the cap the donut contacts the metal causing it to flatten out and this causes it to contact the "eyelet" that protrudes up through the hub (electrical contact-horn blows).  If that's not exactly right on the actual workings I'm sure someone will correct me however I'm certain for the need of the donut.

Steve.
464  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Can a Saginaw 4 speed be built to handle Big Block horse power? on: June 17, 2006, 09:05:45 AM
West

Look at this site.  http://www.autogear.net/   Smiley

Steve
465  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct shifter on: June 16, 2006, 08:05:14 PM
Bob

My original Muncie (68) is attached to my original M22 which is attached to my original L78. Smiley  I can tell you that it has held up VERY well over the years.  It has seen some pretty tough use including power shifts that where smooth and quick (a given if you want to keep the engine   Grin).  An exception?  Maybe.  I can say with all honesty that the only thing that got trashed from the use of the Muncie were the Boss Mustangs, Hemi's, etc. Grin   For what it's worth, I plan on keeping mine in my original 68.

Steve
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 35
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 18 queries.