CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 18, 2014, 12:48:35 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104499 Posts in 12235 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7
61  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Mufflers.... on: June 04, 2008, 09:55:36 AM
We installed a Flowmaster 2.5 inch american thunder on my son's 67, it fit well and sounds great. Well worth the money.
 Pat
62  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69Z Alternators - "CZ 4" stamping, what does the "4" mean? on: May 18, 2008, 10:22:16 AM
I have the build sheet for my 73 Camaro and under ALT it says DE. I assume the codes were to pull the right part at the factory. Others here will know for sure
   Pat
63  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 69 owners with "Pebble-grained" steering wheels (not shrouds) please check in on: April 20, 2008, 07:33:41 PM
Z-28
L513540
12C
TR 712
Z23
Pebble grain on wheel
     
64  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: YH Rally Wheel date code vs car assembly date? on: April 15, 2008, 09:39:52 AM
My car is an LA built Z-28, 12C, the spare is dated K-18-8 YH code
   Pat
65  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: CE block on: March 29, 2008, 11:53:03 AM
I was under the impression that CE blocks were only installed in a warrenty situation. Did dealers also install them as replacements? I'm assuming the freezing up wuold not be warrenty. Pat
66  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Collector's Car Insurance on: February 17, 2008, 05:36:31 PM
Thanks I'll check it out
   Pat
67  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Collector's Car Insurance on: February 15, 2008, 03:57:35 PM
I know there has been discussion on this before, but I just recieved my renewel and wanted some opinions on the price and coverage. The policy is with American Collectors Insuranse Inc.
Two cars with 300,000 liability and $300,000 uninsured motorist.
One car has a value of $51,500, the other $26,500, for collision and comprehensive.
The declaration page states "AGREED VALUE"
The premium is $413 per year. How does this measure up with the rest of the carriers?
    Thanks Pat
68  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Can anyone think of a GM delay wiper switch NOT on the steering column? on: February 06, 2008, 10:59:31 AM
I'm just going from memory here, but I think an early around 75 Monte Carlo"s and probably others of that vintage had a dash switch. I believe it had a slide control with a twist knod to control delay. Could be mistaken it's been a few years
  Pat
69  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: I need a cross ram intake for a dz 302 on: December 28, 2007, 01:47:57 PM
I have run a crossram on my car since 1983. It has tubing headers, 140 cam and 4.10 gears. I totally agree that the 1/4 mile performance and street drivability are not as good as the single four set-up. But,there is something about opening all eight barrels at 4000 RPM in low gear and winding it through the gears. It pulls pretty hard up there. I was able to get it to idle at 900 RPM, this combo seems to like a little race gas mixed with super unleaded. My opinion on the cross-ram may be slanted due to the fact I have only put 4000 miles on the car in the last 25 years and I paid $600.00 dollars for the set-up in 1976. If I drove alot I would put the single four back on. But for an occasional summer driver I love it.
   Pat
70  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: MOTOR MOUNT STRAPS on: November 18, 2007, 03:29:50 PM
I know the recall was in place in 1972, for the 1969 Z-28's. It would be hard to believe that the mounts would be rotted away by that time. I would think it would be a problem with too many hard leaves breaking the mount. GM was known to change the mounts to interlocking style, if tubing headers had been installed, and the kit would not fit around the exhuast.
    Pat
71  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: JL-8 SURVIVORS on: September 01, 2007, 04:57:45 PM
Thanks for the info. Does it follow then that there are very few of the actual production rears out there? Should be easy to spot a clone
Pat
72  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: JL-8 SURVIVORS on: September 01, 2007, 10:38:17 AM
I have heard that the over the counter JL-8 rears were different from the production rears. Anyone have info on this?
    Pat
73  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Warranty Engines on: May 21, 2007, 10:45:31 AM
Any ideas as to why the 33 on the end of the pad stamping is so out of place on the E-Bay CE block referred to by Paul?
                            Pat
74  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Muncie vin #'s on: March 25, 2007, 09:51:24 AM
Were all Muncie's stamped with VIN's? Or just Z-28s
                     Pat
75  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Tic Toc Tach and MSD 6A ignition on: January 05, 2007, 11:13:55 AM
I would call MSD. Their tech dept is very helpful. We installed a 6A on my son's 67 with a repo factory tach, hooked it up to the tach output on the box and it works fine.
Hope this helps Pat
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.31 seconds with 18 queries.