CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 01, 2014, 01:46:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103764 Posts in 12186 Topics by 4698 Members
Latest Member: Ed miles
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 156
46  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 speed warning indicator on: April 26, 2014, 02:40:10 PM
Kurt asked me to post this. I drew it up a few weeks ago when I was working on mine.

Ed

47  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: what happened on: March 14, 2014, 08:53:19 AM
Clem, I removed it until I can get a consensus by the other CRG core members on if they want you to start this up all over again. There was a reason no one on the "other website" replied. It's because everyone is tired of this subject.

However, if the vote is to restore your thread, we'll do so. I'm also going to lock this one.

Ed
48  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: connecting rod reconditioning on: February 28, 2014, 03:12:24 PM
Quote
Some birds chirp just to hear themselves.  Maybe a self confidence issue

Since your reply is obviously aimed at me, I'll just say "chirp chirp".

Sorry to reply to your thread. Don't worry. It'll never happen again.

Ed
49  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: connecting rod reconditioning on: February 28, 2014, 11:37:04 AM
Yeah, I looked it up in the P&A and the 67 350 DID use dimple rods! I didn't realize that. I thought they were like 68 and 69 which DIDN'T use dimple rods. I've deleted my original post.

Ed
50  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 68 Fuel Gauge on: February 26, 2014, 11:04:49 AM
Quote
V-8's with Q-Jets also used a vapor return line.

For 1969. 1967 and 1968 didn't use return lines.

Ed
51  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: A VIN with only 5 digits !! on: February 20, 2014, 09:55:42 PM
Yes, please do post a good picture of the trim tag and the partial VIN on the engine pad.

Ed
52  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: A VIN with only 5 digits !! on: February 20, 2014, 09:46:24 AM
Christophe, you won't see a complete VIN stamped on the engine pad. This is what is called a "partial VIN". It should be something like 19Nxxxxxx, where xxxxxx is the last 6 digits of the car's VIN. If you only have the last 5 digits, it could be a restamp, a factory mistake or one of the digits was stamped too light to see.

Post a picture of the VIN tag, the trim tag and the engine pad and we can tell you more.

Ed
53  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Check on: February 18, 2014, 05:17:09 PM
Why? Are you planning on bidding on it??

Link to EBAY AUCTION

Ed
54  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Rear axle code on: February 17, 2014, 05:42:37 PM
Without paperwork there's no way to know.

What's your VIN? (post a picture of your trim tag and engine pad as well)

If it's in the database, we may have more info on the car.

Ed
55  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Rear axle code on: February 17, 2014, 05:08:13 PM
No, not all 1969 SS 350's came with a 12 bolt (read NOTE 9 for more info). But in your case, if the car originally came with the L48 engine and a manual transmission, it would have had a 12 bolt from the factory.

However, JA G 043 1 is a 1973 or 1974 Nova 2.73 non-posi axle, or a 1975 Nova 2.56 non-posi axle assembled the 43rd day of the year at the Detroit gear and axle plant (day shift), so it's not original to your car.

Ed
56  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 4P L30/M20 on: February 11, 2014, 05:03:22 PM
No. Chevrolet didn't keep records of combination of options. In 67 there were 25,287 Camaros built with the L30 engine. Information on how many of those came with the M20 isn't available.

Ed
57  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 5 originals rallywheels 67 code DG on: February 11, 2014, 02:43:08 PM
Thanks Philip. I'll have to check, but I think that's allowed.

Ed
58  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 4P L30/M20 on: February 11, 2014, 02:38:22 PM
Quote
My little research has found a number of references to the 67's 4p or SS with either the L48 or L30.?

Nope. No such thing as an SS Camaro with the 327.

However, if it's the 4P designation that's confusing you, yes, it was used with the SS 350 and the L30/M20 options. It WASN'T used to stipulate SS, but was only used as an instruction for Fisher Body to install the radius rod. More info HERE.

Ed
59  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 4P L30/M20 on: February 11, 2014, 02:11:53 PM
No such thing as an SS L30/M20

Ed
60  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 5 originals rallywheels 67 code DG on: February 11, 2014, 10:02:20 AM
Philip, are you selling them?

If so, just to let you know we don't allow "for sale" or "wanted" ads on this site. There are other sites that are better for selling, with Tean Camaro CLASSIFIEDS being one.

Ed
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 156
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 5.324 seconds with 18 queries.