CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2014, 07:57:11 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105661 Posts in 12338 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 151 152 [153] 154 155 156
2281  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Engine Decals on: March 24, 2006, 07:34:07 PM
There's nothing that I know of. Especially for the 6's! If I were you, I'd try tracking down 6 cylinder owners on this site and CAMAROS.NET and start taking notes. Most everyone will be happy to send you pictures.

Good luck...

Ed
2282  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: correct location of fender emblems? on: March 24, 2006, 07:30:01 PM
Excellent! Glad to be of assistance...

Ed
2283  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct layout of rear seat belts on: March 24, 2006, 07:19:23 PM
In the rear, starting from the driver's side and going toward the passengers side:

D-ring (by itself) - buckle and D-ring (combined)- buckle and buckle (ombined)- D-ring (by itself).

Ed



2284  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396: Smog Diverter Valve "Broadcast code" question ?? on: March 23, 2006, 10:48:56 PM
Kevin,

That P/N (7036448) was used on all 68 Camaro 396 engines. It will be stamped 28299 and have the "DG" ink stamp on the end of the valve. NOS ones should also be ink stamped as shown in the picture below (it's an NOS valve)... As to what they're worth, it depends on supply and demand.

2285  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 250 Fender Emblems on: March 23, 2006, 10:39:33 PM
Okay, here's a little more info for you...

The 67 Camaro 250 Fender emblem was also used on other models.

Group 8.147 - P/N 3904567

1967 Chevelle
1967 Nova
1967 Camaro
1969 Nova

Both sides are the same P/N so check with your local Chevy dealer. They've probably been superceeded by another number, but they can check that for you. You just never know what you'll find!!

Ed
2286  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: HELP with suspension upgrade? on: March 21, 2006, 08:50:05 PM
Nick,

First of all, if your car bounces up and down on bumps and dips, your shocks are shot! Invest in a good set of shocks before you do anything else and I guarantee you'll feel a difference. Also, before going crazy on high priced "performance upgrades", have the front end rebuilt. If your car is original, your bushings, ball joints, etc... are junk. I think if you start with a good baseline, you'll appreciate it.

Then, if you decide to go further, invest in poly bushings. They're much better than rubber but the drawback is noise. They really need to be greased up.

Anyway, start with the basics first then go from there.

Ed
2287  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Conv. Front Cocktail shakers on: March 20, 2006, 07:07:51 PM
Russ,

Read these two threads on the Team Camaro WEB site. Lots of good dope...

Thread 1

Thread 2

Ed
2288  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: correct location of fender emblems? on: March 19, 2006, 08:36:12 PM
Actually, if you click on "more" for each of them, they all show the same image! I think they're just using that same image as an example. I can't imagine all the templates would be for a 68 327!! You might want to give them a call on Monday.

Ed
2289  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: EC suffix code on: March 19, 2006, 12:18:57 PM
The 3892657 was used in 1967 in a 302, 327 and 350 configuration. The V0104EC shows this engine was originally built at the Flint Engine Plant on January 4th, 1967 and used in a 1967 Chevelle 327/275 with A.I.R and Powerglide.

Hope this helps...
Ed
2290  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: correct location of fender emblems? on: March 18, 2006, 07:33:54 PM
Strat,

Ricks First Generation has TEMPLATE KITS for sale that will give you the info you need. Different "kits" for different models, but they all seem to go for $18.95.
Ed
2291  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 L78 Convertibles on: March 18, 2006, 07:26:58 PM
In 1993 The old Camaro Club published a listing of Coupes -vs- Convertibles in their magazine "The Camaro Enthusiast". In it, they stated that of the 4575 L78 Camaro's built in 1968, 329 (plus or minus .1 percent) were convertibles. Just HOW they arrived at this numbers is unknown, but I would say it's probably in the ball park. Even if it's way off, the L78 Convertible is a rare car.

Ed
2292  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: orginal T3 headlights on: March 17, 2006, 11:26:08 AM
They're on ebay constantly. Do a search on T3 Headlights...

Ed
2293  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1968 Z/28 Jack instruction decal part number on: February 09, 2006, 10:25:23 AM
Bill,

I'm assuming MY REPLY on the Team Camaro site answered your question?

Ed
2294  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: L30 Oil Filler Tubes on: February 09, 2006, 10:18:08 AM
As far as I know, all small block engines for 1968 had the oil fill tube on the intake. Some chrome and some painted. The oil fill on the valve covers didn't start until 1969. Of course, big blocks are another story...

Ed
2295  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: ac delco voltage regulator part number for 68 L34? on: February 05, 2006, 12:23:58 PM
Ferenc,

The original part number for most GM cars from 62 up (using the externally regulated alternator) was 1119515. There were a few exceptions like Transistorized Ignition or 62 amp alternators, but for the most part, that's what you want.

Ed
Pages: 1 ... 151 152 [153] 154 155 156
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.107 seconds with 18 queries.