Messages

3466

General Discussion / Re: AIM?

« on: January 18, 2011, 03:10:31 AM »

Marty, they're ALL copies. The original is/was owned by Chevrolet and never released to the general public. Some copies are better than others and as a general rule (but NOT always the case), the bound versions are usually better than the three ring versions.

Ed

3467

General Discussion / Re: 68 camaro turn signal flasher

« on: January 16, 2011, 02:41:13 AM »

No one that I know of repops the rectangular flasher. Not even the Corvette repop houses, so that probably goes to show you just how little call there is for it.

Ed

3468

General Discussion / Re: For sale or WIW section

« on: January 16, 2011, 02:40:06 AM »

No, we don't have one, but instead us the TC site for WIW and For Sale sections.

Ed

3469

General Discussion / Re: First Gen. Z/28 options

« on: January 15, 2011, 06:25:15 PM »

Not only what Jon said, but people didn't walk into the dealership to buy a Z28 because they wanted "conveniences". They bought a Z28 to race! Most Z28's were stripped down cars to keep the weight down. Nothing but the basics.

Ed

3470

General Discussion / Re: First Gen. Z/28 options

« on: January 15, 2011, 03:26:29 AM »

Paul, you must have posted as I was editing my post to include what the C05 meant! I figured someone would ask!!

Ed

3471

General Discussion / Re: First Gen. Z/28 options

« on: January 15, 2011, 02:50:12 AM »

Convertibles weren't options, they were models. C05 was used to indicate what color top you wanted when you purchased a convertible (Note the price of NC - No Charge).

And no, the stripes weren't available on any other model other than what's already been stated.

Ed

3472

Decoding/Numbers / Re: chevy FACTORY aluminum short V8 water pump ?

« on: January 15, 2011, 01:57:00 AM »

Charley, are there any casting number or other markings on that thing?

Ed

3473

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124678N456560

« on: January 14, 2011, 09:29:14 PM »

Thanks Paul. I would imagine he's not interested, but send him an email anyway. You never know.

Ed

3474

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124678N456560

« on: January 14, 2011, 09:00:30 PM »

It was on ebay back in September of 09 by seller verbua.

It's now a pro touring car, highly modified. It did sell (for $31,700.00), and the buyer was farrow191yh1.

Can you send me a scan of the POP and the dealer info? I'd like to add it to the database.

Ed

3475

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124678N456560

« on: January 14, 2011, 08:50:34 PM »

Yes there is. What is it you need to know Paul?

Ed

3476

Originality / Re: '67-'69 Radiators

« on: January 14, 2011, 04:36:13 PM »

HERE'S a pretty good price on a 66-76 Hollander (42nd edition).

Note that the Mitchell interchange is a harder book to find, so they usually command more $$$.

Ed

3477

Originality / Re: '67-'69 Radiators

« on: January 13, 2011, 02:51:15 PM »

The ones I have are both late 1969 printings and they say 1970 on them. These are fine, but of course they don't have any "newer" car interchange info in them. (In other words, will the 69 Camaro radiator interchange with the 1974 Nova.)

I would get something like a 1975 or 1976 issue. That way you could see what interchanges with later model cars.

Ed

3478

Originality / Re: '67-'69 Radiators

« on: January 13, 2011, 02:14:19 AM »

Check ebay. Amazon has it, but it's NOT cheap!

Ed

3479

Originality / Re: '67-'69 Radiators

« on: January 12, 2011, 07:11:16 PM »

You might also want to get "Chevrolet Parts Interchange manual" by Paul A. Herd. It has a few errors in it, but overall it's a pretty good reference for interchange information. Some of the radiator information even includes measurements.

Ed

3480

Originality / Re: '67-'69 Radiators

« on: January 12, 2011, 03:33:23 PM »

I've posted the page from the Mitchell Interchange below for future reference.

Ed