3226
General Discussion / Re: 1969 camaro listed on ebay needing info.
« on: June 30, 2011, 04:25:28 PM »
Ah, now I see said the blind man.
Ed
Ed
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
3227
General Discussion / Re: 1969 camaro listed on ebay needing info.
« on: June 30, 2011, 03:52:15 PM »Quote
Sarcasm doesnt translate well....
I'm not sure what you mean by that. You asked a question and I answered it. I wasn't being sarcastic.
Ed
3228
General Discussion / Re: 1969 camaro listed on ebay needing info.
« on: June 30, 2011, 02:15:53 PM »Quote
How about an Norwood car sold in LA?
Yes, since LA shut down 4 months before Norwood, Norwood was the only plant, so they shipped coast to coast.
Ed
3229
General Discussion / Re: 1968 Z28 Camaro Engine, Frame, Brakes, Transmission - $7500 (Severance)
« on: June 30, 2011, 02:12:28 PM »
It was on ebay back in 07, so looks like they still have it.
For future searches:
Ed
For future searches:
Quote
Complete 1968 Z/28 Camaro MO code engine for sale. This is from a car that was not numbers matching and was turned into a pro-touring street machine. It is a good running engine that appears to have been recently rebuilt. The frame, four piston disc brakes, and muncie four speed transmission is included. Also has power steering with deep groove pulleys. This is a very rare, hard to find engine.
Engine Block
front pad stamping 18N451710 VO524MO
block casting# 3914678 date E188
Heads
cast # 3917291 date E88 rh E188 lh
Carb
3923289-DZ List 4053 7A4 date
Intake Manifold
cast # 3917610
Exhaust manifolds
3872730 rh 3892683 lh
Alternator
1100814 date 7L8
Distributor
1111467 8D23
Transmission
18S425428 PH827 date case casting # 3925660
This set up is excellent for a 1968 Z28 clone or perfect if you have a real Z/28 needing the drive train. $7500 or may trade for a First generation Camaro needing restored or a 1968 Firebird. I will also consider a 1969-1970 Dodge Charger in trade. Note: rear end in picture is not included.
Severance Autobody--A First Generation Camaro Restoration Shop
970-686-2756
Ed
3230
Originality / Re: Correct Belts (engine compartment)
« on: June 30, 2011, 02:09:20 PM »
Marty, it's difficult to tell by the pictures, but both appear to be aftermarket and not original GM belts.
And all GM belts were smooth. Ribbed is an aftermarket thing.
Ed
And all GM belts were smooth. Ribbed is an aftermarket thing.
Ed
3231
Restoration / Re: 1967 & 1968 Factory Air Conditioning Control
« on: June 28, 2011, 07:46:37 PM »
Daniel, that was the only change I could find in the AIM.
C60, sheet E3, note 7 from February 1st, 1967 "3891796 Switch Removed". I'm assuming the front lens wouldn't change because of that though.
Ed
C60, sheet E3, note 7 from February 1st, 1967 "3891796 Switch Removed". I'm assuming the front lens wouldn't change because of that though.
Ed
3232
Restoration / Re: 1967 & 1968 Factory Air Conditioning Control
« on: June 28, 2011, 06:19:09 PM »
You can email them to me. My email address is in my signature.
Ed
Ed
3233
Restoration / Re: 1967 & 1968 Factory Air Conditioning Control
« on: June 28, 2011, 02:49:28 PM »
The late 67 AC Control lens is a little different than the early 68 lens. I don't have a lot of info on the 67's, but I believe the Firebird was also different. The 67 AIM doesn't show any changes to either the standard heater control or the heater/ac control, so it appears it was the same througout production. However, I'll see what Daniel and Troy have to say. They're more in tune with the 67's than I am.
The numbers you found on the controls are probably casting numbers for the bezels, but send me the pictures and let me see what you have.
Not a great picture, but here's a late 67 AC control (07B) and the drawing from the AIM.
Edit: I also found an early 67 AC control (10E) and it's the same, so unless the VERY early controls were different, they stayed the same throughout production.
The numbers you found on the controls are probably casting numbers for the bezels, but send me the pictures and let me see what you have.
Not a great picture, but here's a late 67 AC control (07B) and the drawing from the AIM.
Edit: I also found an early 67 AC control (10E) and it's the same, so unless the VERY early controls were different, they stayed the same throughout production.
3234
General Discussion / Re: X-11 69 Z-28 CAMARO
« on: June 27, 2011, 10:02:56 PM »
Yep. That's the one.
Ed
Ed
3235
General Discussion / Re: X-11 69 Z-28 CAMARO
« on: June 27, 2011, 09:44:16 PM »
What's the VIN?
Ed
Ed
3236
Restoration / Re: 1967 & 1968 Factory Air Conditioning Control
« on: June 27, 2011, 02:15:03 PM »
Very early 68 lenses were different than later 68 lenses. Although the AIM states (RPO C60, Sheet E3, Note 2) that the lens drawing was revised on September 9th, 1967, it appears the change didn't actually take place until sometime in early to mid October 1967. The first car I have in the database with the new lens is a 10B car.
Here are the differences:
Here are the differences:
3237
Maintenance / Re: Convertible Pump Wiring
« on: June 26, 2011, 05:07:24 PM »
Yep. Just put 12 Volts to the green wire to lower the top or 12 Volts to the red wire to raise the top. There's a complete troubleshooting procedure in the Fisher Body manual.
Ed
Ed
3238
General Discussion / Re: Rear Axle Carriers
« on: June 25, 2011, 02:47:38 AM »
The 2.73 axle used a 2 series carrier, so if the car still has this gear set, no, you don't have to remove the cover.
Ed
Ed
3239
General Discussion / Re: Rear Axle Carriers
« on: June 25, 2011, 01:13:40 AM »
Vic, the 3894859 is the casting number of the center section (some call it the "pumpkin") on the 10 bolt rear end. You can read more HERE.
Ed
Ed
3240
General Discussion / Re: Rear Axle Carriers
« on: June 24, 2011, 07:49:02 PM »
Vic, there will be a casting number on the carrier. Post that number and we can tell you what you have.
Ed
Ed