Messages

1

General Discussion / Re: Factory Chambered Exhaust-69’ 396

« on: April 30, 2023, 02:39:21 AM »

My friend and his wife own over 50 cars.  Most on this site do not work on cars daily. Not sure why Jerry hates D&R. Chuck Fisher is plastered all over the internet and I do work for him. Lifelong friend. There are 2. One is good and the other is a backstabbing scumbag.

You must be so proud to have a friend with means.  Try being the friend with manners.

2

General Discussion / Re: 700 R4 Tranny Question

« on: October 21, 2014, 07:08:07 PM »

https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&hs=LnJ&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=fflb&q=700r4+neutral+safety+switch&oq=700r4+neutral+safety+switch&gs_l=serp.3..0l3j0i22i30l2.8265601.8271348.0.8271794.27.26.0.1.1.0.151.2230.20j5.25.0....0...1c.1.56.serp..1.26.2208.UhPU_5FiJU8

Jeg's has a nice option listed right at the beginning of the results

3

General Discussion / Re: Shippers/haulers (from MI to FL preferred)

« on: October 19, 2014, 12:22:04 AM »

wow sorry to hear that Bill. What was the name of the outfit?

Minuteman, based on what he posted

4

General Discussion / Re: Shippers/haulers (from MI to FL preferred)

« on: October 16, 2014, 06:38:47 PM »

Hey lets see some pics and info of this possible deal please

Nothing that would be of interest to you, I'm sure

5

General Discussion / Re: Shippers/haulers (from MI to FL preferred)

« on: October 16, 2014, 04:06:03 PM »

It's in Milford currently.  It'd be coming to south of Tampa, but I'm willing to travel some of the way to grab it.  Might also be able to have that happen on the other end, not sure.

Also not entirely sure on a date, deal isn't done and I need to have somebody give it a once-over for general condition & any operational issues of concern.

6

General Discussion / Shippers/haulers (from MI to FL preferred)

« on: October 16, 2014, 01:40:27 PM »

Howdy:

Wondering if anyone has used a shipper, and any with a good recommendation.  Have one I'd like to bring from MI to FL.

Thanks

7

General Discussion / Re: barrett jackson las vegas Z-28

« on: November 02, 2008, 11:18:58 PM »

to be fair i will answer your question.i have been on this site since the beginning.i choose to not say who i am.i have a certified Jm 69 z.i purchased it 4-5 years ago and it came with jm certs.so this topic is important to me.but lets not talk about whos posting ok?lets talk about the subject on hand.thank you.

Date Registered:  October 19, 2008, 06:38:41 PM


If you're hiding under a duplicate account, it's far from appreciated and I will be verifying that.  Cowardly starts to be an apt description.

8

General Discussion / Re: barrett jackson las vegas Z-28

« on: November 02, 2008, 01:39:40 PM »

Sorry, but the 2 report thing smells bad.
If KW needed something to finish his car for Carlisle - the list from page 2 would have been all he needed.

Anyone ever sell a car and write up two bill of sales? 

I must say this quote makes a lot of sense to me.
How do we know who is telling the truth? That second report with the “restoration drive train” sentence added could have been revised two days ago! The first report that is supposed to be the draft without the “restoration drive train sentence” is on the guy’s website! And KW and JM both have that copy!
As far as I see it, the \"draft” report without the sentence “restoration drive train” IS THE ORIGINAL!
If this went to a court and KW has only the copy without “restoration drivetrain”and JM had two versions to himself? That would not look good if I were the judge. I think I would have to believe KW.

Don’t kill me for saying what I feel but. I’m sure a few more has thought the same thing i did.

Jerry can't place himself in a position of issuing a falsified report two days ago and be able to maintain his credentials and license as an appraiser.  It would be an incredibly simple thing for that to be lost.

As Ed said, I think you are here strictly to involve yourself in something you have no personal business associated with, and merely wish to stir things up repeatedly.

Try doing something new and novel - THINK before placing fingers on the keyboard to type your next post.  As yourself "Does what I'm typing make the slightest bit of sense in this matter?  Does my input even matter?  Have I actually given thought to the full ramifications of my soon to be incessant rambling?"

I'd bet when you HONESTLY answer those questions, you won't click that "Post" button.

9

Site Comments/Discussion / Re: baldwin motion

« on: March 04, 2008, 02:29:54 AM »

That would be different than stating it was "hijacked"

10

Site Comments/Discussion / Re: baldwin motion

« on: March 03, 2008, 02:55:09 PM »

No, it hasn't.

The b-m site has either been taken down or the registrar and host changed and no content placed at the new site yet.

11

Site Comments/Discussion / MOVED: 1969 norwalk x44 camaro seeking decoding help

« on: February 22, 2008, 08:31:57 PM »

This topic has been moved to Decoding/Numbers.

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=3459.0

12

Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Post Pic not working

« on: October 05, 2007, 02:44:01 PM »

Fixed

13

Site Comments/Discussion / Re: unable to post photos( but I'm a computer nucklehead)

« on: June 17, 2007, 02:29:40 AM »

You can post a linked image, the size doesn't matter then.  Just host it elsewhere.

Or shrink it to 100KB.  Google for "Windows XP Power Toy Image Resizer" (assuming you're using XP) and install that, it's an excellent quick resize tool.

14

Site Comments/Discussion / MOVED: trunk spatter painted before or after balast installation

« on: June 08, 2007, 12:10:53 PM »

This topic has been moved to Restoration.

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=2241.0

15

Site Comments/Discussion / MOVED: Full restoration or????

« on: January 09, 2007, 11:50:23 PM »

This topic has been moved to Restoration.

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=1492.0