Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - 67jeffreyt

Pages: [1] 2
1
General Discussion / Understanding the specifics of 4P
« on: June 11, 2024, 02:13:08 PM »
While I thought 4P was for Fisher for body reinforcement, I'm in a Camaro group that is trying to state 4P was determining SS in 67.  I've read the CRG articles and all the discussions I could find.  But 4P on the tag predates the actual installation of the traction bar upgrade that was in December 66.  So what was actually the reason for 4P on the tag when it was on SS350, and Z28 and eventual mid year big block.

2
General Discussion / Unique 68 cowl tag?
« on: February 24, 2021, 03:11:03 PM »
This tag is not mine,  but was posted in a Camaro group I am in asking if anyone else has a trim tag like the one in the pic.

3
General Discussion / Rear antenna location on drivers side
« on: August 24, 2019, 06:21:06 PM »
Found this 68 on a Facebook post, claims original 51,000 mile paint and body, my question is how unusual is a driver's side rear antenna? Car is all original 6 cylinder convertible.

4
I've looked at the CRG options list and consider everything as fact, but saw this and am curious if it's an anomaly or  been proven.

5
General Discussion / 69 trim tag question
« on: March 15, 2019, 06:24:21 PM »
While I've seen LOS and NOR on the plant designation, VN for van nuys is one I've not seen before other than on a firebird site.  Is this an anomaly or just not discussed often, for a 69 Camaro?  Plus I'm not trying to decipher the tag, I just screen shot the tag to post my question.

6
General Discussion / 1967 Camaro built in 66 titled 1966
« on: February 15, 2019, 02:17:20 PM »
This is way before my time, I'm not sure what the owner is trying to prove to me but he states back when you titled a car it was title the year not the year of the car, so he has a 1966 title for a 67 Camaro. I think he thinks this is a rarity, im not following what he's stating. I need an older person insight that was buying cars in the 60s to explain maybe

7
General Discussion / Two questions of 69 Camaro options
« on: February 09, 2019, 01:14:42 PM »
Could you order a 69 Camaro with rally sport and copo 427 and not badge the car as an SS?   And secondly if GM advertised the cowl induction for the Camaro as a super scoop, how was it labeled and sold by the dealer?  Was it sold as super scoop or was it listed as cowl induction?  I've read that Chevelle got the cowl induction name first.  I wasn't born yet so I'm asking for clarification. 

8
General Discussion / First 67 Yenko Camaro Listed in Yenko inventory
« on: January 14, 2019, 01:28:14 PM »
American muscle car museum

11
It's a 67 camaro, states one repaint, but trim tag shows 4p which I thought meant SS 350 car. Seller states matching numbers 327 rallysport.  Is this an L30 m20 car?

12
Just curious what he has as far as what makes it rare, states engine and rear are factory matching and Muncie is not original matching.

13
General Discussion / Does this plate look legit, the numbers look crooked
« on: September 28, 2018, 07:25:18 PM »
A gentleman on Facebook has a 68 Camaro he bought it from a guy and the guys uncle whom passed away was supposedly the original owner.  He's trying to get any information, the car is badged as SS RS and has the correct lights, rear is 12 bolt rear with MU 350.  Car has been repainted and no SS hood on it.  He's not trying to sell only figure out if it's real SS and RS car.

14
General Discussion / The great 68 Camaro 10 bolt SS debate
« on: August 29, 2018, 02:00:05 PM »
A fellow on another site for selling cars states that CRG is incorrect on a 68 Camaro SS 10 bolt rear.  Where as I stated information from this site that all true SS cars are 12 bolt rear cars.   His information is coming from a Hemmings article on how to find true SS 68 Camaros. He then states he knows for a fact because he owns two 68 SS Camaro 10 bolt rear cars.  I'm not one to argue, so why are there articles out there that are considered truth but incorrect and how does one go about politely passing true information to the owner?  I did invite him to this site to have his car researched.

15
General Discussion / 1967 rear spoiler question
« on: August 06, 2018, 07:32:29 PM »
I looked for any old posts, but was 67 Camaro dealer installed spoiler possible?  I know it wasn't an option, but was it ever available from the dealer at any time? Would it have been possible to add by dealer after 68, or just a body shop modification?

Pages: [1] 2
anything