Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 67jeffreyt

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
General Discussion / Re: Console temperature gauge readings
« on: August 13, 2017, 10:50:02 PM »
Great information, thank you

2
General Discussion / Re: 12 bolt Camaro rear, casting date question
« on: July 23, 2017, 08:59:28 PM »
Ok thank you, I was thinking it was a one not an i. Guy threw in leaf springs and traction bars and complete brakes.  It came with a project 55 Chevy and he was installing a Ford 9 inch.

3
General Discussion / 12 bolt Camaro rear, casting date question
« on: July 23, 2017, 07:59:44 PM »
So I bought this 12 bolt rear cheap, and got home to check all numbers. Multi leaf spring mounts. Axle tube is code BL for a 68 3.07 open rear.  Ring and pinion are dated 67 correct 3.07 ratio.  But the carrier casting number looks like January of 67.  Is it normal to be cast that far in advance before being built? Or am I reading the cast date wrong? Would it be letter I- 28- 7, meaning September 28 1967?

5
Thank you for the quick link post

6
Well at least I know now no metallic brakes, somebody has done some gear posi swap too obviously

7
The ring gear and pinion are dated 67 factory gears , but code states 3.31

8
Looks like QL 0117 G

9
I'll have look, it's a factory 3.55 12 bolt posi, from having the cover off, but I haven't looked at the numbers on the tube. It has the round rod traction bar.

10
My car is 4 wheel drum brake, was manual brakes originally but has a 1969 power brake booster installed.  My car is factory AC car and does not have the brake valve on the frame with no signs it ever had it. I don't have the protecto plate, so I am curious if there's any obvious signs if the metallic brakes were optioned on my car?  All my brake drums are smooth. I've read all the information about the brakes on this site, I just didn't know any obvious signs.

11
General Discussion / Re: new member 67 rs
« on: June 20, 2017, 07:53:50 PM »
This is my frame.  My car is factory ac car 67 Camaro with 4 wheel drum brakes

12
General Discussion / Re: new member 67 rs
« on: June 20, 2017, 06:18:17 PM »
No that's a good pic of the valve, thank you.  The reason I had asked is that the valve usage is supposed to be for ac equiped cars.  But it seems to be a difficult item to guarantee on all ac equiped cars.  My car is factory ac and SS/RS and my car does not show any signs of ever having the valve. Thank you for the pics

13
General Discussion / Re: new member 67 rs
« on: June 16, 2017, 08:58:33 PM »
Yes, I'm just curious if your car has it, it's not to disprove your car, I'm just wanting to see if your car has it or not.

14
General Discussion / Re: I saw a real 1969 Yenko up for sale,
« on: June 05, 2017, 10:46:51 PM »
In California

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6