1
General Discussion / Re: Interesting period photos.... :)
« on: September 26, 2023, 03:43:05 AM »67 Z's were very unassuming.
Like a dog that doesn't bark before it bites

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
67 Z's were very unassuming.
67 RS Camaro ( I wonder if it's a real Z ? a lot of people added the emblems) at Duke's Italian, any one know where that might
have been ? I would say it's the late 70's- '80s.
Considering 67 Zs only had 302 emblems on the fenders, it's definitely not a stock emblem from the factory. Whether it was a Z28 and he installed 68 Z28 emblems on it, or just pretending it's a Z is anybody's guess.
There was also a thick dense foam seal (3 pieces) between the radiator and core support (2 up top and 1 across the bottom IIRC). I’ve only witnessed it on my old 69 and when restoring the 1st pacer of my fathers we used them from my car on his. Idk if I have seen them in repo form but I’ve also not looked recently. That is what’s being called out as #2 in the AIM. #1 is the top seal for the core support and hood.
Shouldn't a January 1969 car have a tachometer as required equipment with Z28 RPO?
Here ya go - whatta deal!
https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=176575
Those wheels could very likely be from an early 1970 Monte Carlo as their rallye wheels were also 'YH' code. THere probably were lots more '70 MC being built at that time than '69 Z28s...
Thanks all!
Doc the divider board and pad were missing when I bought her.
Well, I am looking at that speedo gear number and it says it is for an automatic? Does it matter?... Danny
GM ACDelco 3987921 Original Equipment Automatic Transmission Speedometer Driven Gear