Messages

1

General Discussion / Re: Crossram, was there ever a single carb adapter plate?

« on: March 29, 2023, 12:49:15 AM »

We're all hubcaps delivered in the trunk as well?

If you look in the front of the AIM it lists what was stowed in the luggage compartment.  For 67 it's  UPC 0 Sheet C1 and 1.5

2

General Discussion / Re: Camaro Books

« on: February 24, 2023, 10:04:30 PM »

Thanks for the input 69z. I found a link for the Legends Judging Manual, Is this the newest?

https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=173652

I see on the 2023 Camaro Nationals website, at the bottom of this webpage, there's a contact email address for ordering the 69 manual, so one might assume the 67-68 are also now available to order.  Also states they can ship to you. 

https://camaronationals.org/camaro-legends-1969-judging-manual-now-available/

3

Maintenance / Re: Help - trim on top of trunk divider/over well liner 1968 Camaro Convertible ?

« on: February 07, 2023, 03:02:16 AM »

My 67 is just glued, can't tell if any holes on the top edge of the divider.  I have a fold down rear seat, the liner might extend far enough down to also be under the upper screws of the cardboard finisher panel. 

4

General Discussion / Re: What does "T-3" stand for in GM Headlamps

« on: January 24, 2023, 01:39:38 PM »

Weren't the filaments tungsten?  Might simply be model number or something like 3rd generation tungsten headlamp.

5

Originality / Re: AIR CLEANER SERVICE DECAL

« on: January 18, 2023, 06:45:56 PM »

Thanks Ed, looks like the correct number.6484583. I was told the 69 cars made in 68 had a black decal? Not sure what the 2 letters with the numbers are. Like CO or CN?

No idea, but maybe the two letters are related to or same as the codes and footnotes shown in this chart:

http://gmpartswiki.com/getpage?pageid=49735

6

Originality / Re: AIR CLEANER SERVICE DECAL

« on: January 17, 2023, 03:56:25 PM »

Here's the Feb 69 P&A manual page.  The 4584 cleaner assembly appears to be for auto trans. 

http://gmpartswiki.com/getbigpage?pageid=75055

7

General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro 307 4 speed JL8?

« on: December 30, 2022, 02:39:49 AM »

We were discussing it back in June, starting at post #34

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=18870.msg182118#msg182118

8

Originality / Re: Soldered Radiator Tag

« on: December 14, 2022, 12:19:45 AM »

That would explain why it doesn't include the codes found on a factory tag.

9

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 AIR pump numbers decode?

« on: November 30, 2022, 05:12:07 PM »

Last thing, FWIW - looking at a 1966 P&A on the GM Parts Wiki, it appears a numbers correct pump for your application would have a 5697748 raised part number on the front casing

10

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 AIR pump numbers decode?

« on: November 30, 2022, 12:30:26 AM »

So I checked the four I have and all have that raised 5896122 on the front casing.  That is the number for the aluminum body, not the compete pump.  Those with usage code A have all three hose connections coming straight out the back, while the C code have the larger tube angled off to the side.  All have 5896132 on the rear cast iron section.  I'm thinking they had an ink stamp or decal to differentiate the different pumps at the assembly plant.  Since yours has a 4-bolt pulley and a 1969 date stamp, it must be an "up through 67" service replacement.  Unless you have a show car I'd just get yours rebuilt. They do show up on eBay, if you really need a more correct date.

Here's an older thread on pumps.  There are more, if you run an advanced search using "67 smog pump"
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=17852.msg162156#msg162156

11

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 AIR pump numbers decode?

« on: November 29, 2022, 03:55:37 PM »

Did you already review this report?

http://www.camaros.org/emissions.shtml

The pump is dated 217th day of (I assume) 1969.  The "usage code" per the above link, should be A or C, not U.

Looking at the 1967 AIM under UPC K19 Sheet A5, the correct pump would be 5696104 for a 327 2-barrel.  However, I'm not sure if that is also the number you'd see cast on the main body, or a part number for a full pump assembly.  But since the AIM shows the plug and muffler as separate items, I tend to think the body casting should match the AIM part number listed.  I have a few pumps and will check tonight to see if the casting # is the same as the part # in the AIM. I looked at the GM Parts wiki and didn't get any results at all for your 5696122.

There's a chance that back in the day the original pump locked up and someone went to a salvage yard and pulled your current pump off a 1968 or 1969 GM car.  These Saginaw pumps may have also been used on other makes.     
             

12

Originality / Re: Smog Exhaust Manifold question 67 SS LOS

« on: November 07, 2022, 07:45:15 PM »

You might have a tough time finding the smog tubes for the exhaust manifolds.  I don't believe they are being reproduced any longer.  There was recently a repop set on eBay for crazy money.

Are you planning to have the pump operational, or just for appearance and the tube inlets plugged off?

13

Originality / Re: hood/headliner insulation question-1969 Z28

« on: November 02, 2022, 07:22:08 PM »

Looks like the same material used on the upper seat back, of a rear fold-down seat.  I could not find anything similar a few years ago.

14

General Discussion / Re: Apparently this guy never heard of the L30/M20

« on: October 13, 2022, 06:27:57 PM »

There a comment section below her article, if anyone wished to educate the curious and uninformed, LOL.

15

General Discussion / Re: Wiper arms

« on: September 27, 2022, 06:27:11 PM »

Didn't see a CONV on my 67 arms either, but was using a flashlight and small mirror, while staying away from the paint.