1
1968 - Orphans / Re: 68 Z28 Engine looking for its home
« on: November 13, 2018, 07:49:41 AM »
Is this block still available? If so , please contact me. kinsmd69@hotmail.com
thankyou!!!
thankyou!!!
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
General Discussion / Re: '68 Z28 instrument housing - paint?
« on: November 25, 2015, 06:40:34 AM »
What color instrument housing do you need?
3
1969 - Orphans / 69 Z28 motor
« on: September 23, 2015, 05:39:01 PM »
A z/28 motor with 010 block dated Oct. 69 is on sale in craigslist.
The vin appears to be 19N705705. It looks legit. $6,900.
The vin appears to be 19N705705. It looks legit. $6,900.
4
1969 - Orphans / 19N637837 Muncie trans
« on: March 25, 2011, 06:06:51 AM »
If this is your vin, I have your muncie. PB10
5
Originality / Re: 0421DZ
« on: March 06, 2011, 07:29:04 AM »
Joe, for a 6A car, a correct block would be a 010 with a cast date in the area of 5-8 thru
5-14 and build date of 5-15 thru 5-24, as approximate dates. Then you would have a
correct date block for your car. If you like the hunt, dont quit looking for your original
block, unless you saw it junked. Many cars have had replacement engines put in them
to hopefully increase their value to "almost" original engine car, but still not original.
5-14 and build date of 5-15 thru 5-24, as approximate dates. Then you would have a
correct date block for your car. If you like the hunt, dont quit looking for your original
block, unless you saw it junked. Many cars have had replacement engines put in them
to hopefully increase their value to "almost" original engine car, but still not original.
6
1968 - Orphans / Re: 18n453020 v0531mo eng on E-bay
« on: March 06, 2011, 06:58:51 AM »
Thankyou for the offer Ed, but not at this time. I will keep working on studying engine codes
and just want it to be noted that I respectfully disagree with the consensus.
and just want it to be noted that I respectfully disagree with the consensus.
7
1968 - Orphans / Re: 18n453020 v0531mo eng on E-bay
« on: February 25, 2011, 08:06:38 PM »
Better update your database! I decided just 2 years ago to start keeping pics of engine stamps
and discovered a couple things with original engine stamps that just dont hold up with restamps.
and discovered a couple things with original engine stamps that just dont hold up with restamps.
8
1968 - Orphans / Re: 18n453020 v0531mo eng on E-bay
« on: February 25, 2011, 07:17:51 AM »
What of the pic makes you think its real? The vin has 3 things wrong with it.
Not to mention the nice looking decked pad.
Not to mention the nice looking decked pad.
9
1968 - Orphans / Re: muncie on ebay
« on: February 25, 2011, 02:36:24 AM »
Yes, I asked the seller, and the vin is 465399.
10
1968 - Orphans / muncie on ebay
« on: February 23, 2011, 07:25:00 AM »
Theres a muncie on ebay with vin 18N465599
and date code P8h25.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1968-Camaro-Muncie-4-speed-Transmission-M20-396-427-L88-/190460540179?pt=Vintage_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2c58553513
Hope this works, and helps someone!
and date code P8h25.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1968-Camaro-Muncie-4-speed-Transmission-M20-396-427-L88-/190460540179?pt=Vintage_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2c58553513
Hope this works, and helps someone!
11
1968 - Orphans / Re: 18n453020 v0531mo eng on E-bay
« on: February 23, 2011, 06:02:41 AM »
Well, in the minority again, but it may be real cause it exists, and good
cause its clear and a nice restamp, but my .02 says its not original.
The engine code is a good restamp original looking stamp, but they
need to work on their vin re - stampings. I hope no member
from here got took.
cause its clear and a nice restamp, but my .02 says its not original.
The engine code is a good restamp original looking stamp, but they
need to work on their vin re - stampings. I hope no member
from here got took.
12
General Discussion / Re: is a non-doc 68 Z28 worth buying???
« on: December 07, 2010, 12:35:07 PM »
and lastly I agree... we should be careful with how much we post so as to not educate the bad guys on making better fakes...
I completely agree with the above statement. And I'm sorry, but that is why I can not type what I believe is wrong with
"Chicks" stamp. I just wanted to help GI Joe out and not let him throw good money at a non original car. GIJOE - you mis-typed
yahoo, please re send.
Chick, I did not put that out there to disgruntle you, but just FYI. Of course, since Jerry says its good, whats my .02 worth??
NUTS - what they called a common man named chris, who stated that the world was round.
I completely agree with the above statement. And I'm sorry, but that is why I can not type what I believe is wrong with
"Chicks" stamp. I just wanted to help GI Joe out and not let him throw good money at a non original car. GIJOE - you mis-typed
yahoo, please re send.
Chick, I did not put that out there to disgruntle you, but just FYI. Of course, since Jerry says its good, whats my .02 worth??
NUTS - what they called a common man named chris, who stated that the world was round.
13
General Discussion / Re: is a non-doc 68 Z28 worth buying???
« on: December 04, 2010, 05:07:31 PM »
Well, I dont consider myself an expert either. I have owned a couple 68zs, have several original 68 blocks with good stamps. But besides the stamp in
question here for the guy who started this thread, IMHO, the stamp for 68camaroz28's " 1221 Mo " stamp is a restamp also.
question here for the guy who started this thread, IMHO, the stamp for 68camaroz28's " 1221 Mo " stamp is a restamp also.
14
1969 - Orphans / Re: 19N682330 block
« on: June 21, 2009, 05:19:16 AM »
Reunited with car 6/12/09 . Thanks CRG!!!!!!!!!!! Dan W. Thanks Your an awesome camaro enthusiast and great person.
Pages: [1]