CRG Discussion Forum
Camaro Research Group Discussion => Decoding/Numbers => Topic started by: 67 kemie ss on March 26, 2012, 02:00:29 AM
-
I'm looking at 69Z to purchase. The seller sent me this photo of the tranny VIN stamp. It doesn't look right to me. Anyone care to comment?
-
Looking at the VIN, it appears to have been issued between end of Feb thru March '69
The tranny casting date looks to be the first week of Feb (2 + 1 dot) but a better view will be needed to make sure the dot is not a casting artifact.
It looks like the P-code is 93 XXX(can't make the rest out) so that would be March 69
So far the date periods look good.
What is the tranny case number?
Can you get a picture of the engine VIN stamp too to compare to the tranny and the trim tag?
Mike
-
Here are a couple of other pics
-
Case number is 660 and the dates line up. But the font on transmission VIN stamp doesn't match the font type of block VIN stamp, which I now remember being told should match. I think I've answered my question.
-
I think it's an original stamp.
-
Here's the block VIN.
-
Yup, different stamp. I've seen that before.
I'd have to see the pad stamp to make a call on the block, but looks OK so far....
-
Here's the pad
-
Wouldn't the trans vin stamp have a 1 in front of the 9N609807 ?
-
Mine does, format 19Nxxxxxx, same on the trans as on the side of the block above the Oil Filter...
-
Yes all the stampings I have include the 1 designating Chevrolet.
-
Not a great pic, but I think that's an original engine pad stamp.
Wouldn't the trans vin stamp have a 1 in front of the 9N609807 ?
Charley,
Good question. I think it should have it, but I also found some stamps that didn't. I relooked at those other stamps and I think they actually did have the 1, but it's just hard to see (either pic or funky stamp). So though I think the engine is OK, I changed my mind on the trans.
Thanks for keeping me honest guys. :)
-
Thanks guys.
-
Kurt, so trans stamp is not good or good?
-
I don't think it's good.
-
I agree.
The numbers and letter seem to be the correct font, but I have never seen an original without the 1 in the front.