CRG Discussion Forum

Camaro Research Group Discussion => Originality => Topic started by: rssstmac on April 13, 2010, 04:24:26 AM

Title: 67 subframe
Post by: rssstmac on April 13, 2010, 04:24:26 AM
I have a Van Nuys built 12C date Camaro that has had the subframe replaced at some point.  Should this car have the early style subframe without the large holes on the frame horns?  Thanks for any info.
Title: Re: 67 subframe
Post by: MyRed67 on April 13, 2010, 08:03:50 PM
Rssstmac;  There is a research topic on here about the Early /Late '67 Sub-frame.  Go back click on Research Topics, then scroll down to '67 Topics.  The changeover period was No./Dec. of'66.  I have a 1 st. week Nov. LOS built coupe that has the "early" type(no holes.
Title: Re: 67 subframe
Post by: rssstmac on April 13, 2010, 10:15:33 PM
I did see the research on the early to late 67’ frames and how the change took place in Nov. / Dec.  Has there been any further research to give a more exact time frame?  At this time I have the opportunity to purchase the early style frame and don’t want to pass it up if that’s what my car originally had.  Thanks for any help.
Title: Re: 67 subframe
Post by: MyRed67 on April 14, 2010, 04:03:48 AM
  Hopefully someone else with alittle more knowledge than myself will see this post and shead more light on the subject.  In my estimation, I would say that a 12C built car would be getting near where the changeover was complete.  Meaning that it is most likely that your car would have had the Later style Sub-frame WITH the Tie-down holes.
Title: Re: 67 subframe
Post by: x77-69z28 on April 15, 2010, 07:53:39 PM
my 12D 67 rs/ss does not have the big holes. it was right around the change over.