CRG Discussion Forum

Camaro Research Group Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: dannystarr on September 05, 2021, 09:51:46 PM

Title: This stamp look original
Post by: dannystarr on September 05, 2021, 09:51:46 PM

Not a great pic. I didn't  take it. Hard to see. But does the actual fonting look correct. And is it in the DB? ... nevermind, cant get the pic to load from my phone. I am traveling. I will try when at my PC. Danny

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: dannystarr on September 13, 2021, 03:06:06 AM

OK,
 I am back at my computer. I will try to get this pic posted in the next day or so. ... Danny

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: dannystarr on September 17, 2021, 04:44:04 PM

Here is the picture. NOT a great pic, broaching can't be seen. BUT, is the stamp/fonting original. This is in a Sept. '68 68' Z/28... Danny

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: jdv69z on September 17, 2021, 06:57:24 PM

Sep 67?

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: william on September 17, 2021, 07:00:16 PM

124378L305805 would have been built October of '67.

Was on ebay 2010. Body with the engine was not configured for a Muncie trans.

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: jwbavalon on September 17, 2021, 07:19:54 PM

Wouldn't a October 1967 build have a engine suffix of MO? 

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: MO on September 17, 2021, 11:57:48 PM

Quote from: jwbavalon on September 17, 2021, 07:19:54 PM

Wouldn't a October 1967 build have a engine suffix of MO? 

Yes. All 68's required smog, so all should be the same code.

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: Petes L48 on September 18, 2021, 01:16:15 AM

Danny do you have any of the  block casting numbers? 

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: dannystarr on September 18, 2021, 05:56:25 AM

I was waiting for more info. I have nothing else at this time. I do know that it was in a Sept. of 1968 Camaro Z/28. So there is a that MP, which seems wrong. On eBay in 2010? was it a numbers matching car at that time for the ad? Guess we better let this one go. But is the stamp real for what it is?... Danny

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: KurtS on September 18, 2021, 06:14:54 AM

It was a rolling shell.
Block 3914678, I217. It was an ME, overstamped to be MP.  No MP code in 68.
124378L305805

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: CantRepeat on September 18, 2021, 10:05:22 AM

Quote from: KurtS on September 18, 2021, 06:14:54 AM

It was a rolling shell.
Block 3914678, I217. It was an ME, overstamped to be MP.  No MP code in 68.
124378L305805

After reading your post you can clearly see the top of the P is not stamped the same as everything else.

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: 169INDY on September 18, 2021, 02:35:30 PM

Where is the Joe'Dirt Busted GIF?

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: dannystarr on September 18, 2021, 04:05:10 PM

Thanx Kurt/William/Everyone.. It's a hard pass. Just a car, nothing special I guess. ... Danny

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: 169INDY on September 18, 2021, 04:51:38 PM

Ad Copy??

Title: Re: This stamp look original
Post by: dannystarr on September 19, 2021, 03:55:08 AM

No ad, sent to me by a friend. Or I should say, I didn't look for a "for sale" ad. No longer interested. ... Danny