CRG Discussion Forum

Camaro Research Group Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: RUNUTZ on October 19, 2016, 06:53:49 PM

Title: 1967 6 cyl or ?
Post by: RUNUTZ on October 19, 2016, 06:53:49 PM

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Camaro-/112172886783?forcerrptr=true&hash=item1a1e066aff:g:PDEAAOSw8w1YB62l&item=112172886783

Title: Re: 1967 6 cyl or ?
Post by: bcmiller on October 19, 2016, 07:10:45 PM

It's a 6 via the VIN. Big block heater box and SS gas cap were added.

Title: Re: 1967 6 cyl or ?
Post by: 1968RSZ28 on October 19, 2016, 07:30:33 PM

Quote from: bcmiller on October 19, 2016, 07:10:45 PM

Big block heater box and SS gas cap were added.

Along with the '68 Camaro tail lights.

VIN: 123377N131538

Paul

Title: Re: 1967 6 cyl or ?
Post by: elcamino72 on October 20, 2016, 12:58:30 PM

This car has obviously been sitting for a LONG time.  Why would someone take the time to source the parts for a big block heater core and box cover and install it in this car and keep the six cylinder.  If the heater core went bad why wouldn't they have simply replaced it with what was in there already?  Interesting

Title: Re: 1967 6 cyl or ?
Post by: bertfam on October 20, 2016, 08:02:54 PM

Looks like someone MANY years ago was going to convert the car to a big block, but apparently never got around to replacing the engine! Maybe they figured out that the 12337 VIN would raise red flags.

Ed

Title: Re: 1967 6 cyl or ?
Post by: RUNUTZ on October 21, 2016, 02:08:32 PM

maybe check the hidden vin?

Title: Re: 1967 6 cyl or ?
Post by: ko-lek-tor on October 21, 2016, 04:15:26 PM

Current VIN # supplied in ad is too early for a 67' BB car

Title: Re: 1967 6 cyl or ?
Post by: bertfam on October 21, 2016, 05:47:22 PM

Quote

Current VIN # supplied in ad is too early for a 67' BB car

Considering it's a 6 cylinder VIN, it couldn't be a big block car.

Ed