CRG Discussion Forum
Camaro Research Group Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: HustleRussell on June 05, 2016, 04:26:07 PM
-
http://www.gatewayclassiccars.com/dallas/1967/chevrolet/camaro-S162.html
-
Some of the panels appear different color, like the trunk. And 375's were not available with automatic transmission in '67.
-
.....Again the quality is there, the paint was done well as was the build. Here though you will find that this car was originally a 327 CID car. - See more at: http://www.gatewayclassiccars.com/dallas/1967/chevrolet/camaro-S162.html#sthash.xyWmtWZJ.dpuf
At least that was up front about being a 327. But it does show an 4N L35 engine code on the TT so that was obviously changed (the rivets give it away? ;D )
I see the VIN does fall into the June 67 range to match the 06D TT date so I wonder if VIN and TT were swapped onto this body which should make it an illegal car (?) due to a VIN swap -or- a period correct TT was put on to an existing body with this VIN. I'd be curious what the hidden VIN shows. The VIN star rivet still has a stud showing flush which I have never seen before but that's not to say it can't exist. The trunk floor looks replaced being I don't see any welded spare tire hook bracket. But hey......it does have the infamous fan sticker! Interesting enough it has an axle traction bar.
I'd say this was a tribute/clone and nothing more.
Mike
-
Bodywork is crude. Decent daily driver and not worth near the asking price. Being it is a dealer, someone will buy it thinking it is a great car for the money. Most dealers do not know what is correct anyway.
-
In PA. turning back the speedo is illegal too, even on old cars.
-
124377N240740