CRG Discussion Forum

Camaro Research Group Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: 69RALLYSPORTZ28 on August 14, 2020, 09:08:20 PM

Title: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: 69RALLYSPORTZ28 on August 14, 2020, 09:08:20 PM
If we only knew where the original 302 engine was.
It would be the best of two worlds
An original Z/28 with a Motion 427
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: z28z11 on August 14, 2020, 09:17:50 PM
Unless I misread the work order, it was carrying a CE replacement block at the time of the 427 swap. Dealer likely scrapped that motor in '69 -

When (date) was the 427 installed ? Didn't see that on the WO -

Regards,
Steve
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: MO on August 14, 2020, 11:31:59 PM
I don't think that is a WO. It looks more like a trade in evaluation or an appraisal. With over 87,000 miles on it, the CE 427 must have been installed a lot earlier.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: ZLP955 on August 14, 2020, 11:36:18 PM
Would need solid provenance...... and unclear (to me) what the CS sheet represents - part of an appraisal, sales receipt, work order, etc.
OP is that a car you own?
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: x66 714 on August 14, 2020, 11:47:39 PM
That paper is at least newer than 1983 because that's when zip+4 came out. 65 series tires is newer than that but I can't find when they were first used. WWW was 1989...Joe
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: MO on August 15, 2020, 12:07:45 AM
Bob Harris started Camaro Specialties in 1984-85 I think. So the paper is no earlier than that.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: ZLP955 on August 15, 2020, 02:06:54 AM
124379N574523
Records found on www.vinaudit.com
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: Stingr69 on August 15, 2020, 03:35:57 PM
Its just a description of a car that was filled out more recently.  It is not a historical document.  Web site address too.

Bob's shop on Elm street is his 3rd or maybe 4th location since he has been doing business. 
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: Fred Mertz on August 17, 2020, 11:47:52 PM
What is the complete "CE" number stamped on the pad?  The first digit after "CE" should be the year of the warranty replacement.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: Kelley W King on August 26, 2020, 08:34:12 PM
to me any document without a date is just a piece of paper.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: BRG Z28 on August 26, 2020, 11:20:06 PM
There would have been a second page to the appraisal with a date.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: BULLITT65 on June 02, 2023, 06:45:50 AM
There it is resisted :https://www.rkmotors.com/vehicles/4528/1969-chevrolet-camaro-z-28-rs
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: BULLITT65 on June 02, 2023, 06:48:13 AM
Do we know that the trim tag is legit?
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: cook_dw on June 02, 2023, 02:48:43 PM
Tag appears to be legit
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: BULLITT65 on June 02, 2023, 05:13:41 PM
Also I thought the electrical and washer hose were strategically placed. Made me wonder if the rivets were questionable.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: rocco376 on June 04, 2023, 07:47:46 PM
Lol-Very interesting.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: David K on June 05, 2023, 01:42:11 PM
Bullit-agreed here as well. The 10 10 raises a flag for me.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: bcmiller on June 05, 2023, 04:05:22 PM
That document does nothing for me.

Would need to have a LOT more proof and I don't think you will get any.
Title: Re: If we only knew where the original 302 was
Post by: Stingr69 on June 05, 2023, 08:22:27 PM
A 3-year old thread and nobody thought about calling Bob to ask him what this document is about? ???