CRG Discussion Forum
Camaro Research Group Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: PHAT69AMX on October 27, 2018, 08:48:51 PM
-
? Anyone able to identify the GM SOURCE DOCUMENT of this page-15 ?
? And the DATE that GM Source Document was issued / printed ?
This Page-15 image is the 1st of a 10-page group from Page-15 thru 24.
All 10 pages are about 1st Gen Z-28, but have only these 10 pages.
So am unable to determine the Source Document and the Date...
Hoping some one can identify the Source Document and Date issued.
-
Very much doubt the source was GM, as there are some inaccuracies.
Whereabouts did you come across it, for starters?
-
It's not a GM document.
-
Ah, ok, it is from the GM Heritage Center Web Site for the 1968 Camaro, it is part of a 132 page PDF file there all for the 1968 Camaro that can be downloaded. It is a compilation of documents and pages from various sources. There is a blank separator page between each different "page group". That Page 15 thru 24 Group is Page 63 thru 72 in the 132 page 1968 Camaro PDF Document...
-
When I bought my Camaro many years (before CRG) ago I was looking for information and called GM Owner Relations Dept.
They offered to send me an information package on my new (to me) 1968 Camaro. A big thick package arrived and I was so excited that I was getting the history of my special car. Then I open the package and realized it was just a bunch of poorly photo copied crap. A lot of it not even GM original. Just photo copies of a sales brochure, AMA specs, and white book data.
Funny thing is it is exactly the same today, only you can download it from GM. Any one want to see a photo copy of a photo copy of a color brochure in black and and white with 3-ring binder holes punched in it? Here you go, thanks GM:
https://www.gmheritagecenter.com/docs/gm-heritage-archive/vehicle-information-kits/Camaro/1968-Chevrolet-Camaro.pdf
-
No idea why they include non-GM material in the packages. It infringes on copyright....
-
The sales brochure is pure crap. They own that, why not use a nice color version?
-
You get what you paid for might apply here ::)