CRG Discussion Forum
Camaro Research Group Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: 6667ss138 on June 09, 2014, 01:43:15 PM
-
I thought of you Bullitt (Austin) when I saw this one. Not sure its 100K nice but I will admit it sure looks good!!
I see a few things wrong and for that money and I would have liked to seen documentation. But they sure make it look good in those pictures.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-Hardtop-2-Door-1969-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-Hardtop-2-Door-302ci-/161319960652?forcerrptr=true&hash=item258f6b404c&item=161319960652&pt=US_Cars_Trucks
-
Is this one of the things you saw?
(http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/g360/splendidauto/1969%20CAMARO%20Z28/camaro30_zps4167abf7.jpg~original)
Something odd, its definately been off the car, but I don't have my tag files at work to compare this to, but I'm leaning towards it being a repro tag. It is a sweet looking car though.
Not originally a gauge car, since it doesn't have a clock in the center of the dash.
-
Yes Mark something does look off there...
100k no smog or manifolds that'll run $2000 ouch! I saw the Tail light lenses (x77 didn't have vertical stainless trim), however the correct ones are not reproduced. Reproduction interiors just look too plastic to me.
Really a very nicely done car if the numbers checked out as legit...
I've not too big on red cars since I was a teenager but I do like Garnet red when it looks like that one!
-
Nicely presented, but no stampings shown, I don't like the tag, the rear with a December assembly date? I think mine is a week before production. You would think for 100k, you would get the right shift handle, not one out of a peterbilt! A lot of correcting to do with a hefty price tag!
-
Looks like a repo tag to me... But would like a better straight on photo.
-
Is this one of the things you saw?
(http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/g360/splendidauto/1969%20CAMARO%20Z28/camaro30_zps4167abf7.jpg~original)
Something odd, its definately been off the car, but I don't have my tag files at work to compare this to, but I'm leaning towards it being a repro tag. It is a sweet looking car though.
Not originally a gauge car, since it doesn't have a clock in the center of the dash.
But it has the T3 headlights with even a close up pic. Surely everything is legit. :)
Yeah, I noticed that the rivets had been messed with for sure.
They are getting smarter and not posting any VIN numbers.
-
Its about 4500 body numbers ahead of my car built same week
-
Edited original post for a little lysdexia... Mine is an 08D and is body number 106672. That about sums it up...
-
Mark, I'm just curious. After checking further did you decide if your suspicions were right and this one has a repop tag?
-
Mark, I'm just curious. After checking further did you decide if your suspicions were right and this one has a repop tag?
Only 243,085 69 Camaros were built. What body number is this one?...
-
I think it's a repro.
NOR289984
-
I keep forgetting that the body numbers were reset to 100,000 in August.... so my posts were irrelevant. Disregard...
-
It is not consistent with other tags of the same week, I have a bunch of tags from the same timeframe as this one and they don't have the same characters style on several of the numbers. So yes I would say it is a repro. The body number is also probably the original number though. No telling what the car was originally now, was it just a color change on a Z, or was it a base 307 coupe.
-
It is not consistent with other tags of the same week, I have a bunch of tags from the same timeframe as this one and they don't have the same characters style on several of the numbers. So yes I would say it is a repro. The body number is also probably the original number though. No telling what the car was originally now, was it just a color change on a Z, or was it a base 307 coupe.
X2 I came to the exact same conclusion...bad characters but body num was prob original.
-
Sorry, we have been moving into a new house so I am just now getting back up to speed. Nice pics but I also noticed the tail lights, exhaust tips look funny to me? I know its a fresh resto but sits a bit to high for me. I also noticed there wasn't a clock. So along with the trim tag, to me there is to many questionable items , to think the rest of the car is legit. Documentation would be the key for a lot of it.
I do like the Garnet Red paint, but there may be a bit of photoshop used for the reflective properties in those pics. ;)
thanks for posting, I didn't see it on ebay.
-
relisted for 99k or make offer.
-
Wow, he really dropped the price a bunch. Maybe he heard the word was out that the car is bogus and he is trying to unload it for deal :o
-
I highly doubt it... :D
He does want to unload it, but I think it will still be a expensive purchase for somebody that wants that specific car. There are other Garnet Red 69 Z cars out there, just have to be patient to find an original, or a nice correct resto.
-
There are other Garnet Red 69 Z cars out there, just have to be patient to find an original, or a nice correct resto.
Or you could just buy a Hugger Orange one because thats what everyone really wants anyway :) ...( Sorry Austin couldn't help myself). Speaking of Garnet Red 69 Z's I vote we go back to Indiana later this summer and pick yours up. Truck and trailer are at the ready just say the word..
-
PM SENT.
Your good guy Jack!